Page 38 - ver3

Not Satisfactory Satisfactory
Levels of Evaluation
Non-
Full
Minimal
NA Compliance Compliance Substantial Compliance
Compliance
Elements of Evaluation 1 2 3 4
At the beginning of each course, students are
provided with comprehensive information about
the course, including learning outcomes,
teaching and learning strategies, and
2-3-3 √
assessment methods and dates, as well as what
is expected from them during the study of the
course and feedback on their performance is
provided for them.

The program applies mechanisms to support and
2-3-4 motivate excellence in teaching, and encourages √
creativity and innovation of the teaching staff.

The program implements clear and publicized
procedures to verify the quality and validity of
2-3-5 √
the assessment methods, and to ensure the
level of student achievement.

Effective procedures are used to control
academic integrity at the program level to
2-3-6 √
verify that the work and assignments of
students are their own. *

Overall Evaluation of the Standard

Total Sum of Evaluation of Criteria
(4+3+3+4)+(3+3+4+3+4+3)+(3+4+4+3+3+3)=54
(Total Sum of Points)

Number of Applicable Criteria 16

Average Evaluation of the Standard 3.375

Overall Quality Rating of the Standard 3

* Essential Criteria

Comments on Results:
The self-evaluation of standard No. 2 using the self-rating scale showed that all criterion criteria
were rated from 3-4 points out of 4 considering three sub-standards with 16 applicable criteria. All
areas of the standard elements were implemented through regular evaluation and the evaluation
results showed substantial compliance level

38