Page 57 - ver3

Satisfaction:

The overall students' evaluation of quality of learning experience at the course level is good

(4.44), which is exceed the target benchmark as indicated by KPI-P-03 (Annex S2-2-2-4 Report of
KPIs 1444H, page No. 14) as shown in Table S2.2.2.2. This KPI-P-03 measures the students overall

rating on the quality of their courses taught in MENG program. The rating for the academic year

2022-2023 is found to be 4.44 (out of 5). The previous ratings for the academic year 2021-2022
and academic year 2020-2021 are 4.4 and 4.3, respectively. The current rating (4.44) is greater

than the target benchmark (3.6). Unfortunately, lack of information is found related to the

external benchmark.

Table S2.2.2.2: KPI-P-03 of MENG for Current Year Compared to the Target, Internal and External
Benchmarks
KPI Reference Number KPI-P-03
Key Performance Indicators KPIs Students evaluation of the quality of the courses
KPI Results
External
Actual KPI Value Internal Benchmark* Benchmark

Target Benchmark
2022-2023 2021-2022 2020-2021

M F Avg. M F Avg. M F Avg.

4.44 N/A 4.44 3.6 4.4 N/A 4.4 4.3 N/A 4.3 N/A

2-2-3 The construction of the program study plan considers the identification of exit-points

requirements (if any).

Not Applicable

2-2-4 The learning outcomes in the courses are aligned with the program learning outcomes

(e.g., Matrix for the alignment of the learning outcomes of the courses with program learning

outcomes).

The articulated PLOs and the CLOs matrix together serve as the foundation of a coherent
program. It is an extensive process to set consistency of PLOs with CLOs, which is an important

step in determining the content, avoiding redundancy and assessing the LOs. Curriculum matrix or

mapping went through different phases, as PLOs were updated/reformed as previously

57