Page 96 - ver3

4. Independent Evaluations (Optional)

4.1 Describe the process used to obtain an independent opinion on the self-evaluation

4.2 List the recommendations and other matters raised by the independent evaluator(s)

4.3 Provide a response report on recommendations and other matters raised by the
independent evaluator(s)

Attach the report(s) by independent evaluator(s).

5. Action Recommendations

Action recommendations should be based on the priorities for improvement and other matters identified in the SSRP.

Action Person(s)/units Resources
No. Timelines
Recommendations Responsible Required
1 The recruitment faculty members Dean of Faculty At the end of Appointment
to reduce the student-to-faculty and Head of the Academic policy for
ratio and achieve the desired Department Years 1445 and university
benchmark of 13:1. 1446. teaching staff
2 Updating the website to provide Quality Committee At the end of -
reliable and publicly disclosed and all department the Academic
information to the community members Year 1445.
about the program
description, performance, and
achievements that meet the
stakeholders’ needs.
3 Revision of the KPIs with re- Dean of Faculty During the third -
external benchmarking of KPIs with and Head of semester of the
academic programs, rather than Department academic year
institutional comparison. 1445.

96