Page 29 - Newham SuDS DESIGN & EVALUATION GUIDE
P. 29

be found at depth of less than 3 meter - at   Links to relevant Newham Policy, flood risk   Application of Greenfield Runoff Rates  site specific evidences and mitigation
 Local SuDS requirements
 least seasonally. Ground water Source   studies and further LLFA’s guidance (detailed   requirements provided to be evaluated by
 Protection Zones are found in the northern   requirements) can be found on the Newham   To enable consistency of assessment   Newham Local Planning Authority.
 part of the borough.   Flooding webpage as below:  between planning applications by London
      Borough of Newham LLFA representatives,                https://www.londoncityairport.com/
 LB Newham Flooding Webpage  use of default soil types for the actual site,   corporate/Environment/biodiversity-and-
      determined by HR Wallingford’s UKSuDS                  safeguarding
 www.newham.gov.uk/localplan (Policy SC3)
      online tool is the preferred approach. London          Pre-Planning Advice: Newham provides
 Flood Risk and Sustainable Drainage:   Borough of Newham LLFA will not object to   pre-application advice for developments as   Local SuDS requirements
 Requirements and Guidance for Planning   Greenfield runoff calculations based on FEH   part of a PPPA agreement. Newham LLFA

 Application  methodology providing that the results are     can provide specific pre-planning advice as
      largely consistent with IH124 methodology
 Newham LLFA drainage pro-forma                              part of a PPPA or by direct agreement with
      output from UKSuDS online tool and that the            applicant. Please note that in either case a
 Newham PAR  HOST soil class used in the calculation can be
 Fig.5 Newham’s main made ground (grey/grey   demonstrated to be representative of the   fee specific to LLFA is entailed. LLFA can
 hatched) and source protection zones (shades   Highlights of main requirements:   provide applicants with information and
 of pink)  pre-development condition of the site.            maps on topography, geology, flood risk,
 •  All major development is required to   London Borough of Newham LLFA does not
 The interplay of the above factors may limit                greenfield runoff recommendations for SuDS
 potential for infiltration drainage, however,   restrict post development runoff to   accept the following approaches:  measures.
 given the high variability in ground conditions   greenfield run-off rates unless it can be   •  urban soil types for Greenfield runoff   Adoption of SuDS
 found across the borough, it is recommended   demonstrated that site conditions prohibit   estimation
 to carry out thorough ground investigation   the ability to do so.  Newham will not adopt SuDS unless these
 for all development to establish the potential   •  All development must restrict runoff   •  applying urban catchment parameters to   are projects implemented by Newham on
 23   for infiltration.  discharge within or to Critical Drainage   runoff estimation   council own land.  Applicants should   24
 Areas (CDA) to greenfield rates or below.   Local LPA and Stakeholder Engagement  therefore put in place arrangements for
 It should be noted that none of the above   N.B. there are 15 CDAs in Newham.
 prevents use of SuDS within a development if   In addition to LLFA the Environment Agency   maintenance and end of life replacement of
 integrated in the design at early stage. Above   •  Discharge to tidal water (i.e.  River   and Thames Water must be consulted with   SuDS. Details must be provided to the LLFA
 ground, non-infiltration SuDS measures can   Thames, Lea and Roding) will need to   concern of flood risk, discharge consents,   to add to their asset register. There are other
 be used in areas of contaminated ground   take account of the effect of “tide   building in proximity to flood defences   Risk Management Authorities such as
 provided that barriers to potential   locking”, storm surge or submergence of   structures and watercourses.   Thames Water or TFL who may be willing to
 mobilisation of contaminates such as   the outfall, in order to prevent flooding.    consider adoption of SuDS. Early
 impermeable liners or clay capping are used   An appropriate allowance in terms of   London City Airport (LCY): Under concern of   engagement is required to ensure their
 to prevent risk to groundwater.  onsite storage should be built into the   risk management (i.e. bird strike) LCY may   requirements can be achieved.
 drainage strategy.  object to development proposal deemed
 Local SuDS specific requirements   potentially to increase of bird presence in the
 •  Discharge to tidal water may not be
 Newham LLFA has developed a number of   restricted to greenfield provided scour/  airport safeguard area. Whilst this concern
      should be heeded and early consultation with
 documents in connection with local flood risk   erosion would not result, however a level
 assessment and management. Main   of attenuation will be expected - normally   City Airport is advised, LCY’s general concern
      should never be used to scope out
 requirements applicable to major   a 1 in 30 attenuation - to create SuDS
 development are fully embodied in Newham’s   features that provide additional benefits.  requirement of green infrastructures,  such
      SuDS, nor LCY’s objection accepted without
 local policy (Newham Local Plan 2018).


 London Borough of Newham SuDS D & E Guide                                                     © 2018 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates  London Borough of Newham SuDS D & E Guide                                                     © 2018 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34