Page 107 - Coincidences in the Bible and in Biblical Hebrew

COINCIDENCES IN THE BIBLE AND IN BIBLICAL HEBREW
86 86 COINCIDENCES IN THE BIBLE AND IN BIBLICAL HEBREW

I. Quotations from Kaku (1994, 2005):
• In referring to the elliptic modular functions, basic mathematical tools for
string theories , which have been developed by the Indian mathematician
genius Srinivasa Ramanujan, Kaku writes, “When we add two more

dimensions to Ramanujan’s functions” [physicists add two extra dimen-
sions to mathematical functions in order to construct a physical theory],
“the ‘magic numbers’ of mathematics become 10 and 26, precisely the
‘magic numbers’ of string theory” (2005, 202–03).
• “The Big-Bang , as we shall see, perhaps originated in the breakdown of
the original ten-dimensional universe into a four- and a six-dimensional
universe” (1994, 195).
• “Beginning with the instant of Creation, we have the following stages
in the evolution of our universe: 10 –43 seconds: The ten-dimensional
universe breaks down to a four- and a six-dimensional universe. The
six-dimensional universe collapses down to 10 –32 centimeter in size. The

four-dimensional universe inflates rapidly.” (1994, 213).
• “The laws of physics simplify in higher dimensions . In this case, the 26-
dimensional space of the counterclockwise vibrations of the heteronic

string has room enough to explain all the symmetries found in both
Einstein s theory and quantum theory” (1994, 159).
’
• “One of the deepest secrets of string theory, which is still not well under-

stood, is why it is defined in only ten and 26 dimensions . If the theory
were three dimensional, it would not be able to unify the known laws of

physics in any sensible manner” (1994, 172). In a modified statement

reflecting advances in the pursuing ten years since 1994, Kaku writes,

“Consider Type I and the heterotic SO(32) string theory .. . The type
I string is defined entirely in ten-dimensional space, while the SO(32)

string is defined with one set of vibrations defined in the twenty-six
dimensional space … However … the theories possess a powerful dual-
ity: if you let the strength of the interactions increase, type I strings
change into SO(32) heterotic strings, as if by magic” (2005, 216).
• “In other words, physicists have not the slightest understanding of why ten
and 26 dimensions are singled out as the dimension of the string” (1994,
173; italics in the source).
• “The heterotic string begins by compactifying 26-dimensional space

down to 10-dimensional space, leaving us with 16 compactified dimen-
sions , which yields the group E(8)xE(8). This is more than enough to
accommodate the Standard Model ” (1994, 345).