Page 183 - Vol_2_Archaeology of Manila Galleon Seaport Trade
P. 183

154                                                         T.-K. Lu

            stronghold to trade with China. For the Chinese maritime merchants who lived in
            Fujian region, the coming of the Spaniard undoubtedly provided a new business for
            overseas trade. For example, in 1639, a Chinese of!cial Fu, Yuan-Chu (!!!)
            had mentioned in his report as follows:
              The Franks (Spaniard) from Luzon Island saw our ban for maritime activity, but secretly
              visited Tamsui and Keelung from time to time and did business with vice businessmen. It
              only needs one day from their place (the coast of the Fujian province) navigated to Taiwan.
              Our government knew the problem but could not forbid. Even we prohibit these activities
              but could not eradicate them. This situation only led the of!cials and smugglers who reside
              along the coastal regions easily made pro!ts from maritime trade. (Gu 1966: 33)

              The scale of the trade of the Spaniard in northern Taiwan was far less than that of
            the Dutch who lived in southern Taiwan. Most of the funds for trade by the
            Spaniard were sent by relief fleets navigating from the Philippines. It was the !rst
            time in 1628, the Spanish galleon Rosario from Manila purchased a big quantity of
            merchandises with very low price from the Chinese traders who came to Keelung
            for business (Mateo et al. 2001: 136). This business pro!t reflects the highly
            commercial potential. For this reason, in the next year (1629), the !rst echelon of
            the relief fleet from Manila visited Keelung, attracted a group of Manila traders
            carrying cash about 200,000 pesos to Taiwan, wishing to purchase Chinese cargos
            and silks (Mateo et al. 2003: 329). Thus, northern Taiwan had been included into
            the Spanish “Manila galleon trade” and shared the business prospect of the silver
            which was brought from America. The new circumstances also promoted the trade
            status of northern Taiwan in the East Asia waters (Chen. 2005: 208).
              Most purchase of the Spaniard focused on silk cargos, but not the ceramic trade.
            Even though, some de!nite ceramic trade records still could be seen in the
            intelligence that the Dutch acquired. For example, in 1628, the Dutch got the
            information from Keelung and Tamsui that there were people who traded (with
            Spain) from Fucho (!!) in violation of the ban. Others shipped large quantity of
            porcelains from northern region of China to northern Taiwan. In February, 1633,
            The Dutch captured a Chinese junk which sailed from Keelung to Manila, and most
            of its cargos belonged to Spaniard, which included 1560 pieces of Chinese
            porcelain (Chiang 1999: 85). The Spanish trade in Taiwan frequently faced the
            problem of lacking funds. It had something to do with the conditions of the relief
            fleets visiting Taiwan in each year. If the Spaniard in Taiwan could not get enough
            silver for buying merchandises, the Chinese merchants could not but ship back their
            cargos and suffered the loss (Mateo et al. 2001: 258, 2003: 332).
              The strongholds that Spaniard set in northern Taiwan, from the beginning to the
            end, were mainly for military defense, and never became the transit station in a large
            scale as the Dutch did even though there are some relics that clearly reveal the ceramic
            trade by Spaniard in northern Taiwan in !rst half of the seventeenth century. For
            instance, TheKraakblueandwhiteporcelain plateswhichwerefoundinthevicinityof
            the fort Santo Domingo, Tamsui (!!", !!), were the typical Chinese export
            wares (Fig. 8.3-2; Tu 2007: 32–34), and Similar wares could be found in Hatcher
            shipwreck which sank approximately in 1643 (Sheaf and Kilburn 1988: 47). After the
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188