Page 129 - DUOKOPT BIBLIOBOOK
P. 129

EFFICACY










                  Januleviciene et al





                  TABLE II - COLOR DOPPLER IMAGING PARAMETERS DURING 12 MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP

                         Treatment groups   Baseline   1 mo    6 mo         12 mo        F; df=3; p
                  OA PSV     DTFC      23.79 (8.84)*   37.10 (12.33)   38.15 (16.24)*   40.66 (15.51)*   4.69; 0.005
                             LTFC      30.86 (9.30)*   36.04 (7.83)   33.87 (8.27)   42.50 (14.01)*   3.542; 0.02
                  OA EDV     DTFC      4.82 (2.47)*   8.22 (4.22)   8.87 (6.03)   10.59 (4.79)*   4.212; 0.009
                             LTFC      7.03 (3.60)   8.78 (3.94)   7.66 (2.52)   9.63 (5.11)   1.316; 0.278
                  OA RI      DTFC       0.79 (0.11)   0.79 (0.07)   0.76 (0.11)   0.72 (0.12)*   1.546; 0.213
                             LTFC       0.76 (0.11)   0.74 (0.11)   0.76 (0.09)   0.82 (0.17)*   1.053; 0.376
                  CRA PSV    DTFC      15.09 (3.77)*   17.78 (4.43)*   19.08 (7.59)*   28.88 (13.40)*   8.009; <0.001
                             LTFC      17.91 (7.80)   18.59 (7.34)   17.67 (5.95)   22.71 (12.82)   1.062; 0.373
                  CRA EDV    DTFC       4.56 (1.81)*   6.49 (2.22)   6.0 (2.49)   7.56 (3.67)*   3.328; 0.026
                             LTFC      6.33 (2.48)   5.41 (3.19)*   6.16 (2.64)   10.31 (7.34)*   3.795; 0.015
                  CRA RI     DTFC      0.80 (0.26)   0.68 (0.08)*   0.65 (0.08)   0.74 (0.19)   2.333; 0.084
                             LTFC      0.81 (0.25)   0.80 (0.16)*   0.72 (0.19)   0.85 (0.19)   1.158; 0.334
                  SPCA PSV   DTFC      15.55 (4.70)   15.95 (5.91)   20.03 (6.42)   19.81 (7.04)   2.361; 0.081
                             LTFC      14.49 (6.59)*   13.38 (3.10)*   17.92 (3.68)   21.01 (10.41)*   4.106; 0.011
                  SPCA EDV   DTFC      4.42 (2.29)   4.69 (2.28)   6.10 (2.16)   6.04 (2.66)*   2.091; 0.112
                             LTFC      4.38 (2.85)   3.31 (2.11)   5.47 (2.22)   3.43 (2.26)*   2.67; 0.056
                  SPCA RI    DTFC      0.71 (0. 06)   0.75 (0.08)   0.69 (0.06)   0.70 (0.07)*   1.744; 0.168
                             LTFC      0.79 (0.28)   0.79 (0.10)   0.69 (0.11)   0.90 (0.27)*   2.474; 0.071
                  *p<0.05 Statistically significant.
                  F = Fisher criteria, df = 3; OA = ophthalmic artery; PSV = peak systolic velocity; DTFC = dorzolamide/timolol; LTFC = latanoprost/timolol; EDV = end diastolic
                  velocity; RI = resistive index; CRA = central retinal artery; SPCA = short posterior ciliary artery.


                  surements is zero, Wilcoxon signed rank test was used.   BP and PP parameters was observed between the two
                  Changes in OBF and glaucomatous optic neuropathy pa-  groups at the 12-month visit (p>0.05; t test). Mean increase
                  rameters (functional and structural changes) were analyzed   over 1 year of treatment in ocular perfusion and diastolic
                  by Pearson correlation analysis.          perfusion pressures were 10.46% and 10.67% in the DTFC
                                                            group and 7.47% and 5.61% in the LTFC group, respec-
                                                            tively (p>0.05; t test). The mean increase in OP when com-
                  RESULTS                                   pared to baseline and the 1-, 6-, and 12-month visits were
                                                            5.38, 9.04, and 2.49 mmHg in the DTFC group and 0.86,
                  We examined 30 patients with OAG with a mean age of   5.72, and 4.77 mmHg in the LTFC group (Fig. 1). Fluctua-
                  58.13 (8.60) years. The study included 5 males and 25 fe-  tions in DPP are shown in Figure 2. We observed strong
                  males. There were no statistically  significant differences   correlation between perfusion pressure and both systolic
                  between baseline parameters of either treatment group   and diastolic BP at the 1-, 6-, and 12-month visits and no
                  (Tab. I). Baseline IOP was 22.1(2.69) mmHg with DTFC   correlation between OP:IOP and DPP:IOP.
                  and 20.57 (3.25) mmHg with LTFC (p=0.1715, t test). Mean   The baseline retrobulbar blood flow parameters measured
                  IOP decreased with DTFC treatment by 5.77 mmHg, 5.93   with CDI were similar between the two groups (p>0.05; t
                  mmHg, and 5.0 mmHg at the 1-, 6-, and 12-month study   test) (Tab. II). In both combination treatment groups, ret-
                  visits, respectively; accordingly, LTFC treatment lowered   robulbar blood flow velocities tended to increase, although
                  the IOP by 5.67 mmHg, 5.87 mmHg, and 5.44 mmHg. The   statistically significant changes were only found in the
                  IOP-lowering effect of both treatment groups was similar   DTFC group at the 1-month visit in the OA PSV (p=0.004),
                  (p>0.05; t test).                         OA EDV (p=0.02), and CRA PSV (p=0.02). Statistically sig-
                  The LTFC group showed a statistically significant decrease   nificant changes compared to baseline remained in DTFC
                  in BP, ocular perfusion, and diastolic perfusion pressures   group after 1 year: OA PSV (p=0.003), OA EDV (p=0.001),
                  (PP) at 1- and 6-month visits. No significant difference in   CRA PSV (p=0.001), and CRA EDV (p=0.01). Statistically

                                                                                                793


             EJO_790-797_Janule.indd   793                                                      3-08-2009   14:04:14






                                                                                                                   129
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134