Page 208 - Daniel
P. 208

proof of the late date for Daniel. They argue that if Daniel actually lived
               in  the  sixth  century  B.C.,  as  conservative  scholars  maintain,  he  would
               have  also  been  very  curious  about  the  first  three  beasts.  Montgomery

               states,  “The  seer’s  contemporary  interest  is  revealed  by  his
               inquisitiveness  concerning  the  last  beast  and  the  judgment  which
               hitherto had been hid in figures.”         67

                  But  there  is  no  justification  for  this  argument.  Daniel’s  vision
               emphasized the fourth beast because of its uniqueness and because of its
               impact  on  God’s  saints.  As  Archer  observed,  “Of  all  the  beasts  Daniel
               saw, he regarded the fourth with the greatest curiosity and dread (v. 19),
               because  it  resembled  no  animal  known  to  human  experience.  In
               particular he wondered about the ten horns from which the little horn

               emerged (v. 20) and which was allowed to overcome God’s holy people
               (v. 21).”  68
                  Whereas  only  three  verses  are  given  to  the  first  three  beasts,  the

               remaining twenty-one verses of the chapter concern the fourth beast and
               his era; and Daniel used eleven verses to describe the details.
                  If this is genuine prophecy, it is also true that Daniel was being guided

               providentially  to  that  which  is  important  from  God’s  standpoint.  Even
               from a human standpoint, the end of the ages with the triumph of the
               saints  would  be  a  matter  of  primary  concern  to  Daniel.  The  critics’
               argument  is  dissipated  by  their  own  premise  that  even  the  fourth
               kingdom  was  already  history  at  the  time  a  second-century  writer
               recorded it, and in that case Daniel’s curiosity would have to be faked in

               seeking  the  interpretation  of  history  rather  than  a  prophetic  vision.
               There is no indication in the text that Daniel thought the fourth beast
               already had been fulfilled in history.

                  The judgment rendered “for,” or on behalf of, the saints delivers them
               from  the  unrighteous  oppression  of  the  beast  and  prepares  them  to
               receive the kingdom. The “Ancient of Days” refers to God, as in verses 9
               and 13, and is identical to “the Most High” (vv. 18, 25, 27). In the same
               way the destruction of the fourth beast and the inauguration of the fifth
               kingdom  from  heaven  is  described  as  the  time  when  the  saints  will

               possess the kingdom, a clear factor pointing to the end of the age and
               the second coming of Jesus Christ.


                   THE INTERPRETATION OF THE VISION OF THE FOURTH BEAST
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213