Page 117 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP Innovation and entrepreneurship
P. 117

53231_Innovation and Entrepreneurship.qxd  11/8/2002  10:50 AM  Page 110




              110                THE PRACTICE OF INNOVATION

              development,  right  after  the  Napoleonic  wars.  Until  then  bankers
              were  moneylenders  who  lent  against  “security”  (e.g.,  the  taxing
              power of a prince). Saint-Simon’s banker was to “invest,” that is, to
              create  new  wealth-producing  capacity.  Saint-Simon  had  extraordi-
              nary influence in his time, and a popular cult developed around his
              memory and his ideas after his death in 1826. Yet it was not until 1852
              that two disciples, the brothers Jacob and Isaac Pereire, established
              the first entrepreneurial bank, the Credit Mobilier, and with it ushered
              in what we now call finance capitalism.
                 Similarly,  many  of  the  elements  needed  for  what  we  now  call
              management were available right after World War I. Indeed, in 1923,
              Herbert  Hoover,  soon  to  be  President  of  the  United  States,  and
              Thomas  Masaryk,  founder  and  president  of  Czechoslovakia,  con-
              vened the first International Management Congress in Prague. At the
              same time a few large companies here and there, especially DuPont
              and General Motors in the United States, began to reorganize them-
              selves around the new management concepts. In the next decade a
              few “true believers,” especially an Englishman, Lyndall Urwick, the
              founder of the first management consulting firm which still bears his
              name, began to write on management. Yet it was not until my Concept
              of the Corporation (1946) and Practice of Management (1954) were
              published that management become a discipline accessible to man-
              agers all over the world. Until then each student or practitioner of
              “management” focused on a separate area; Urwick on organization,
              others on the management of people, and so on. My books codified
              it,  organized  it,  systematized  it.  Within  a  few  years,  management
              became a worldwide force.
                 Today, we experience a similar lead time in respect to learning
              theory.  The  scientific  study  of  learning  began  around  1890  with
              Wilhelm Wundt in Germany and William James in the United States.
              After  World  War  II,  two  Americans—B.  F.  Skinner  and  Jerome
              Bruner,  both  at  Harvard—developed  and  tested  basic  theories  of
              learning, Skinner specializing in behavior and Bruner in cognition.
              Yet only now is learning theory beginning to become a factor in our
              schools.  Perhaps  the  time  has  come  for  an  entrepreneur  to  start
              schools based on what we know about learning, rather than on the old
              wives’ tales about it that have been handed down through the ages.
                 In other words, the lead time for knowledge to become applicable
              technology and begin to be accepted on the market is between twen-
              ty-five and thirty-five years.
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122