Page 120 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP Innovation and entrepreneurship
P. 120

53231_Innovation and Entrepreneurship.qxd  11/8/2002  10:50 AM  Page 113




                                   Source: New Knowledge                113

              ently picked up where the Brothers Pereire had left off, added the
              knowledge base of banking to the venture capital concept, and suc-
              ceeded. The first was J. P. Morgan, who had been trained in London
              but had also carefully studied the Pereires’Crédit Mobilier. He found-
              ed the most successful entrepreneurial bank of the nineteenth centu-
              ry in New York in 1865. The second one, across the Rhine, was the
              young  German  Georg  Siemens,  who  founded  what  he  called  the
              “Universal Bank,” by which he meant a bank that was both a deposit
              bank  on  the  British  model  and  an  entrepreneurial  bank  on  the
              Pereires’ model.  And  in  remote  Tokyo,  another  young  man,
              Shibusawa Eichii, who had been one of the first Japanese to travel to
              Europe to study banking first-hand, and had spent time both in Paris
              and in London’s Lombard Street, became one of the founders of the
              modern Japanese economy by establishing a Japanese version of the
              Universal  Bank.  Both  Siemens’s  Deutsche  Bank  and  Shibusawa’s
              Daichi Bank are still the largest banks of their respective countries.
                 The  first  man  to  envisage  the  modern  newspaper  was  an
              American,  James  Gordon  Bennett,  who  founded  the  New  York
              Herald. Bennett fully understood the problems: A newspaper had to
              have enough income to be editorially independent and yet be cheap
              enough to have mass circulation. Earlier newspapers either got their
              income by selling their independence and becoming the lackeys and
              paid propagandists of a political faction—as did most American and
              practically all European papers of his time. Or, like the great aristo-
              crat of those days, The Times of London, they were “written by gen-
              tlemen for gentlemen,” but so expensive that only a small elite could
              afford them.
                 Bennett  brilliantly  exploited  the  twin  technological  knowledge
              bases  on  which  a  modern  newspaper  rests:  the  telegraph  and  high-
              speed printing. They enabled him to produce a paper at a fraction of the
              traditional cost. He knew that he needed high-speed typesetting, though
              it was not invented until after his death. He also saw one of the two non-
              scientific bases, mass literacy, which made possible mass circulation
              for a cheap newspaper. But he failed to grasp the fifth base: mass adver-
              tising as the source of the income that makes possible editorial inde-
              pendence. Bennett personally enjoyed a spectacular success; he was the
              first of the press lords. But his newspaper achieved neither leadership
              nor financial security. These goals were only attained two decades later,
              around 1890, by three men who understood and exploited advertising:
              Joseph  Pulitzer,  first  in  St.  Louis  and  then  in  New
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125