Page 68 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP Innovation and entrepreneurship
P. 68

53231_Innovation and Entrepreneurship.qxd  11/8/2002  10:50 AM  Page 61




                                    Source: Incongruities                61

              rather than up. Costs have risen much faster than services—perhaps
              three or four times as fast. The demand will continue to rise with the
              steady growth in the number of older people in all developed countries
              over the next thirty years. And so will the costs, which are closely tied
              to the age of the population.
                 We do not understand the phenomenon.* But successful innova-
              tions,  simple,  targeted  and focused  on  specific  objectives,  have
              emerged in Great Britain and the United States. These innovations are
              quite different simply because the two countries have such radically
              different systems. But each exploits the specific vulnerability of its
              country’s system and converts it into an opportunity.
                 In Britain, the “radical innovation” is private health insurance, which
              has become the fastest-growing and most popular employee benefit. All
              it does is to enable policyholders to be seen immediately by a specialist
              and to jump to the head of the queue and avoid having to wait should
              they need “elective surgery.”† For the British system has attempted to
              keep  health-care  costs  down  by  “triage”  which,  in  effect,  reserves
              immediate attention and treatment to routine illnesses on the one hand
              and to “life-threatening” ailments on the other, but puts everything else,
              and especially elective surgery, on hold with waiting periods now run-
              ning into years (e.g., for replacing a hip destroyed by arthritis). Health
              insurance policyholders, however, are operated on right away.
                 In contrast to Great Britain, the United States has so far tried to sat-
              isfy all demands of health care regardless of cost. As a result, hospital
              costs  in America  have  exploded. This  created  a  different  innovative
              opportunity: to “unbundle,” that is, to move out of the hospital into sep-
              arate locations a host of services that do not require such high-cost hos-
              pital facilities as a body scanner or cobalt X-Ray to treat cancers, the
              highly  instrumented  and  automated  medical  laboratory,  or  physical
              rehabilitation. Each of these innovative responses is small and specific:
              a freestanding maternity center, which basically offers motel facilities
              for mother and new baby; a freestanding “ambulatory” surgical center
              for surgery that does not require a hospital stay and post-operative care;


                 *This is brought out clearly in the best discussion of the health-care problem that
              has appeared so far, and the only one that looks at health care across national bound-
              aries, in all developed countries. It is given in The Economist of April 29, 1984.
                 † Surgery for complaints that yield to surgery, will not improve without it, but
              are not “life-threatening.” Examples are cataracts, hip replacements and orthopedic
              surgery generally, or a prolapsed uterus.
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73