Page 20 - faculty manual 2020-2021
P. 20

requirement, clearly   contact, doesn't run
                practiced)            over allotted time

                Self-Evaluation
                Analysis of group     Clearly articulates   Discusses only two of   Does not articulate any of
                process and           what worked well and   the three; discusses   the three – what worked
                individual role       why, what did not     group without          well and why, what didn't
                within it             work well and why,    discussing self;       work well and why, how to
                                      and ways to increase   discusses self without   improve
                                      effectiveness and     discussing group
                                      efficiency of group
                                      process in the future,
                                      considering self as
                                      well as others


               *Faculty members should ensure that the assignment has at least five (5) dimensions that the students
               must analyses. These dimension may vary according to topic, course etc.


               Grading Rubric for Assignment

                Dimension               Exemplary              Competent               Needs Work


                Introduction            Position and           Position is clearly     Position is vague.
                                        exceptions, if any, are   stated.  Organization of  Organization of
                                        clearly stated.        argument is clear in    argument is missing,
                                        Organization of the    parts or only partially   vague, or not
                                        argument is completely  described and mostly   consistently
                                        and clearly outlined and  implemented.  2-3 pts   maintained.
                                        implemented.   4-5 pts
                                                                                       0-1 pts

                Research                Research selected is   Research is relevant to   Research selected is not
                                        highly relevant to the   the argument and is   relevant to the
                                        argument, is presented   mostly accurate and   argument or is vague
                                        accurately and         complete – there are    and incomplete –
                                        completely – the       some unclear            components are
                                        method, results, and   components or some      missing or inaccurate or
                                        implications are all   minor errors in the     unclear. Theory is not
                                        presented accurately;   method, results or     relevant or only
                                        Theory is relevant,    implications.  Theory is  relevant for some
                                        accurately described   relevant and accurately   aspects; theory is not
                                        and all relevant       described, some         clearly articulated
                                        components are         components may not be  and/or has incorrect or
                                        included; relationship   present or are unclear.   incomplete
                                        between research and   Connection to theory is   components.




               19                                                                      Last updated 8/25/2020
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25