Page 123 - Exhibit No. 9 Faculty-Manual Latest Edition - Copy
P. 123

RATING PERIOD

                       Performance evaluation is shall be done every six months ending on June 30 and
               December 31 of every year. However, if there is a need for shorter or a longer period, the
               minimum appraisal period shall be at least 90 calendar days or three (3) months while the
               maximum shall not be longer than one (1) calendar year.


               KEY PLAYERS AND THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES

                           KEY PLAYERS                             RESPONSIBILITIES
                SPMS Champion – University                    1.  Establishes  and  implements
                President                                        the SPMS
                                                              2.  Sets    agency     performance
                                                                 goals/objectives              and
                                                                 performance measures
                                                              3.  Determines     agency      target
                                                                 setting period
                                                              4.  Approves  office  performance
                                                                 commitment and rating
                                                              5.  Assesses     performance       of
                                                                 offices

                Performance Management Team               1.     Sets consultation meeting of all
                (PMT)                                     heads  of  offices  for  the  purpose  of
                University PMT:                           discussing the targets set in the office
                                                          performance  commitment  and  rating
                1.     Vice-President, AFS                form
                2.     Vice President, ARA                2.     Recommends  approval  of  the
                3.     Chief Administrative Officer       office  performance  commitment  and
                4.     Director, Planning                 rating to the Head of Agency
                5.     Director, Administrative           3.     Acts as appeals body and final
                Services                                  arbiter  for  performance  management
                6.     Director, Finance                  issues of the agency
                7.     Director, Quality Assurance        4.     Identifies  top  performers  and
                8.     Director, Quality                  provide  inputs  to  the  PRAISE
                Management Representative                 Committee  for  grant  of  awards  and
                9.     President, CSC-Accredited          incentives
                Faculty  Association                      5.     Adopts  its  own  internal  rules,



                                                                                       2016 Faculty Manual     123
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128