Page 176 - V4

Sefer Chafetz Chayim VOL-4 6 םייח ץפח רפס
Hilchot Esurei Rechilut תוליכר ירוסיא תוכלה
Kelal Gimal - Halachah 4 ד הכלה - ג ללכ

show any mercy) to (a Meh’seet who is) his father. (Answer-) Because אקפנ אוה ,םיבורק ראש ןינעל ונכראהש הז לכו
the Torah wanted to conclude with “your hand shall be the first against
him to kill him,” that the mitzvah is for the enticed person to be the first ,םדא םושל תולגלמ ןריהזי םא וליפא ןינעל הנימ
to punish the Meh’seet and kill him. And if not for the Torah specifically תעב םהמ דחא לע תונג םוש עמשנ אלש רבד אוהו
instructing us in this regard (to include a father who is a Meh’seet), we
never would have known it based on our own reasoning, as the Gemara .ל"נכו הז לכל ךירצ ןיא יכה ואל יאד ,רופיסה
teaches (Sanhedrin 85b) “a son may not act as the court’s agent to hit his
father or curse him…except for a Meh’seet” as I wrote above. Everything
we have elaborated on regarding his other relatives applies even if he first םייחה רוקמ
cautions them not to repeat the comment to anyone else, and even though
ְ
ַ
ָ
ַ
ַ
ֶ
ָ
ֶ
ֲ
ַ
ְ
ֵ
ַ
ְ
ָ
ָ
the comment conveyed by gossip did not demean anyone, because if that תא חיִכוֹיֶּשׁ ידֵכּ ,וֹרבחל רבדּה תא וֹרְפּסבּ וֹתנוּכּ םִאו .ד
was not so, none of this would have been necessary, as I wrote above.
ַ
ִ
ַ
ֵ
ָ
ָ
ֵ
ֵ
ְ
קלחבּ ליֵעל ןיּע ,ןוֹעְמִשׁ לע ערָה ןוֹשׁל רבּדֶּשׁ לע ןבוּארְ
ֶ
ֵ
ַ
ְ
ְ
ָ
.]'ה[ 'ו ףיִעס 'י ללכִבּ 'א
ָ
Mekor Hachayim
RK3/4. If the speaker’s motivation in conveying those comments
to a fellow Jew is for that “friend” to rebuke Reuven for speaking
Lashon Hara about Shimon, regarding this circumstance please see
what I wrote above in the first part of this sefer, in the 10 Kelal,
th
th
the 6 halacha.
rd
End of the 3 Kelal

167 166
volume 4 volume 4