Page 76 - Aldi Lukman Nurhakim_How to Write Critical Esays: A Guide for Students of Literature
P. 76

Making a detailed case  75
             printed page. What your own prose suggests must be shown to
             be at least tenable.
               Should you go further? Should you organize the evidence
             into proving that your view is not just reasonable but right?
             Perhaps striving to change your tutor’s mind is good exercise
             for your own.
               There are various conventions which operate here and their
             relationship is problematical. Most tutors will want you to
             develop and express your own opinions but many will still deal
             harshly with an essay which sounds opinionated. An objective
             survey of available approaches is often welcomed as one
             ingredient of a student essay. Yet those students who devote the
             whole of their answer to reporting the views of others are likely
             to be condemned for failing to think for themselves.
               You can present your case as if you were some honestly
             polemical barrister consistently arguing for one side in an
             imaginary court of cultural law. Many essays derive a useful
             clarity and vigour from trying to convince their readers that one
             conclusion is true and the alternative false.
               You can, by contrast, attempt the objectivity supposedly
             achieved by a judge when summing up the conflicting
             evidence. Here all the relevant facts are recalled and discussed.
             Contrary views of their significance are explained as neutrally
             as possible. You can try to give some hypothesized jury of
             reasonable readers the materials on which to base their own
             decision.
               Your own handling of evidence should probably adopt some
             compromise between candidly partial advocacy and
             meticulously impartial judiciousness. Any minimally competent
             barrister understands that simply to ignore the opposing
             evidence would be counter-productive. It must be
             acknowledged and weighed with perceptible fairness before
             being found wanting. Otherwise, the selectivity will be
             recognized as grossly misleading and the argument rejected.
             Conversely, the way in which a judge sums up rival bodies of
             evidence must in practice reveal some preference. The relative
             prominence given to particular facts, or to certain ways of
             interpreting them, will hint advice as to which verdict could
             seem slightly, but measurably, more appropriate.
               Extremes are best avoided. Beware of devoting too much of
             your essay’s energy to persuasion as distinct from exposition.
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81