Page 39 - November December 2020 TPA Journal
P. 39

rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Texas or      trate, the officer must “state on the back of the
         by other applicable laws and rules.” TEX. GOV’T     same, or on some paper attached to it, the manner
         CODE § 552.0035(a).                                 in which the warrant” was executed and “also
         The  Texas Supreme Court adopted Rule of            deliver to the magistrate a copy of the inventory of
         Judicial  Administration 12.4, which generally      the property taken.” Id. art. 18.10. Other than the
         makes judicial records open to the public for       entitlement of the owner or possessor of the place
         inspection and copying. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN.         searched to a copy of the warrant and written
         12.4(a), reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE, tit. 2,      inventory, the Legislature did not directly address
         subtit. F app. However, this general right does not  what right anyone else might have to those partic-
         apply to judicial records “covered by Rule[]        ular documents, or to the warrant return the offi-
         12.3,” which includes “records or information       cer delivers to the magistrate. Instead, chapter 18
         relating to                                         provides only that the sworn affidavit supporting
         [a]. . . search warrant.” Id. 12.4(a), 12.3(c).     a search warrant generally becomes “public infor-
         Instead, “access to [such records or information]   mation when the search warrant for which the
         is controlled by . . . state or federal court rule,  affidavit was presented is executed.” Id. art.
         including a rule of civil or criminal procedure,    18.01(b).
         appellate procedure or evidence[,] or . . . common  A court’s “primary goal in construing a statute is
         law, court order, judicial decision, or another pro-  to give effect to the Legislature’s intent.” Shinogle
         vision of law.” Id. 12.3(c). Accordingly, we con-   v. Whitlock, 596 S.W.3d 772, 776 (Tex. 2020). A
         sider your question in the context of the Code of   court “must always consider the statute as a whole
         Criminal Procedure.                                 rather than its isolated provisions” and “not give
         Chapter 18 of that code governs the search war-     one provision a meaning out of harmony or incon-
         rant process. See generally TEX. CODE CRIM.         sistent with other provisions, although it might be
         PROC. arts. 18.01–.24. “A ‘search warrant’ is a     susceptible to such a construction standing alone.”
         written order, issued by a magistrate and directed  Id. at 776–77. But in considering the statute as a
         to a peace officer, commanding him to search for    whole, a court must also give “effect to each pro-
         any property or thing and to seize the same and     vision so that none is rendered meaningless or
         bring it before such magistrate . . . .” Id. art.   mere surplusage.” TIC Energy & Chem., Inc. v.
         18.01(a); see also id. art. 18.04 (listing the requi-  Martin, 498 S.W.3d 68, 74 (Tex. 2016). In article
         sites for a sufficient warrant). An applicant for a  18.01(b), the Legislature addressed the public
         search warrant must file a sworn affidavit setting  nature of an affidavit supporting a search warrant
         forth substantial facts establishing probable cause  but not the warrant itself, the return, or the inven-
         to the magistrate’s satisfaction before the warrant  tory. By contrast, in the related context of arrest
         may issue. Id. art. 18.01(b). “On searching the     warrants, the Legislature expressly included the
         place . . . the officer executing the warrant shall  warrants themselves in its declaration of the “pub-
         present a copy of the warrant to the owner” or the  lic information” to which a magistrate must pro-
         person in possession of the place, if they are pre-  vide access when the arrest warrant is executed.
         sent. Id. art. 18.06(b). Before taking any property,  See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 15.26 (“The
         the officer must “prepare a written inventory” of   arrest warrant, and any affidavit presented to the
         it, endorse it with his name, and give it to the    magistrate in support . . . is public information . .
         owner or possessor. Id. If neither the owner nor    . .” (emphasis added)). Ordinarily, “[w]hen the
         the possessor is present when the warrant is exe-   Legislature expresses its intent regarding a subject
         cuted, the officer must “leave a copy of the war-   in one setting, but . . . remains silent on that sub-
         rant and the inventory at the place.” Id. When the  ject in another, [a court] generally abide[s] by the
         officer returns the search warrant to the magis-


        Nov.-Dec. 2020           www.texaspoliceassociation.com • (512) 458-3140                         35
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44