Page 132 - Daggabay Magazine Issue 9
P. 132

Fields of Green for ALL  •  Collectively Reforming South African Cannabis Laws



            workers. Therefore, the rights of workers need to   focus on legacy and/or skilled people previously
            be highlighted in a manner that will showcase      involved in Cannabis-related activities under
            Cannabis workers’ rights as a model that is both   illegal settings. This is also a central element in the
            economically viable and revolutionary in terms of   ethical principle of historical justice, remedy and
            the rights afforded to workers, often left behind on   reparations for victims of human-rights abuses
            the path to prosperity.                            overlapping in the name of Cannabis prohibition
                                                               (see section 3.1). All efforts must be made to utilise
            A wide range of skills are required in all sectors,   existing skilled labour as part of government’s
            but it must be taken into account that the existing   responsibility to assist and monitor the transition
            non- regulated Cannabis industry already has       of populations previously involved in Cannabis
            many of these skills. Priority in employment should   cultivation.




            5.5.7  Cannabis Testing At Work


            Since the de facto decriminalisation of Cannabis   It is extremely difficult to visually recognise
            cultivation, possession and use in a private space   Cannabis intoxication. It rarely happens that
            by the Constitutional Court of South Africa in     someone uses Cannabis to the extent that
            September 2018, some laws on the periphery of the   they become incapacitated or unsteady in the
            1992 Drugs & Drug Trafficking Act have become      workplace. Therefore testing of this nature
            outdated and are in serious and urgent need of     becomes completely random, or it is used as
            review. One such law is the Occupational Health    a human-resources leverage tool. It is a simple
            & Safety Act of 1993.  The use of Cannabis is now   process to have a known Cannabis user dismissed,
                              37
            sanctioned in a South African home, but remains    even though their work ethic might be exemplary.
            an illegal substance at work. At Fields Of Green   “If you resign, we’ll give you a reference” is a typical
            For ALL we have been subjected to the plight of    employers’ stance.
            individuals and workplace testing for many years.
            We have a folder of emails from ex-employees who   This being said, there are obviously careers that
            were summarily dismissed for testing positive for   require a zero tolerance for intoxicating substances
            THC and want to know if they have any recourse.    in the workplace. The South African mines are a
            None of the tests being done (for Cannabis) can    good example. Most industrial situations using
            prove impairment, problematic use or time of       heavy machinery already have a zero tolerance
            last dose, and this is becoming the holy grail for   policy in place and an employee would sign a
            legislators and test companies. Unlike alcohol,    contract to that effect. However, does that mean
            cocaine and opiates, Cannabis sits in the body’s   that those employees are simply banned from
            fat cells for anything up to a month, so to use a   ever using Cannabis? There would never be such a
            workplace test that cannot prove an employee’s     ban for visiting an alcohol consumption room after
            intoxication invariably ends badly for the employee.   work? Drug testing in the workplace will therefore
            Testing should only be used to detect impairments   always be a delicate balance between safety and
            rather than the legal use of Cannabis in an        privacy. What if an employee is using medical
            employee’s private life . This is invariably not the   Cannabis? Does that mean complete exclusion
                                38
            case.                                              from that employment arena?
            We believe no person should be subjected to        Current methods for testing for Cannabis include
            testing for Cannabis at work, unless there are     hair, urine, saliva and blood testing – all of which
            sufficient grounds that the employee is not        are problematic for various reasons, including
            fulfilling his/her duties in terms of an employment   being invasive, taking time to administer and get
            contract and there are also sufficient grounds to   results and as mentioned, current methods of
            suspect that the employee’s use of Cannabis is the   testing do not indicate real-time impairment. The
            cause of it.                                       overwhelming problem with a drug test, whatever
                                                               the method utilised, is giving a yes/no answer
                                                               to an extremely complex, variable and organic




           88        CANNABIS IN SOUTH AFRICA  •  THE PEOPLE’S PLANT  •  A Full-Spectrum Manifesto For Policy Reform
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137