Page 865 - บทความทางวิชาการหลักสูตร ผู้พิพากษาหัวหน้าศาล รุ่นที่ 21

๘๕๓

Abstract

Approaching the fair use of criminal penalties to offenders is a critical task
of judges. If discretion is exercised with awareness of all-round effects and appropriate

adaptation to individual offenders would benefit the most and create confidence in

the judgment of the case which the judge can use the discretion to punish the same
standard The court's standardized list of punishments, known as "Yi Tok," is therefore an

important part Because judges use the standard list of penalties as a criterion for
determining the punishment for Judgment is the same standard. If the penalty standard

account specifies the threshold in no detail. There may be a problem of discretion

in determining the sentence of different judges in the same court. It may be viewed
as unfair and affect the overall credibility of the court. However, even the Penalty

Standards List does not have detailed criteria and some offenses are difficult to define
in the Penalty Standards list to be consistent. But there are also recommendations of the

President of the Supreme Court on how to suspend sentence. 2012, recommendations

of the President of the Supreme Court on how to suspend sentence. waiting punishment
and the determination of conditions for probation, B.E. 2559, and the recommendation

of the President of the Supreme Court on Guidelines for the use of criminal penalties,

B.E. which allows the judge to use it as a guideline for using the discretion to determine
the criminal punishment in one way If carried out according to the advice of the

President of the Supreme Court It is a guarantee that the discretion used has been

carefully scrutinized. The case should therefore adhere to the advice of the President of
the Supreme Court as a tool for discretion as well in order to set the standard of

punishment for performance. This will result in being able to provide justice to the
people according to the objectives of the court.

Keywords : Discretion, Standard Penalty Account, Criminal Use

บทน า

ิ
เมื่อดุลพนิจที่ศาลใช้ในการลงโทษต่างอาศัยเกณฑ์ตามที่ก าหนดไว้บัญชีมาตรฐานการ
ิ
ลงโทษ บัญชีมาตรฐานการลงโทษจึงเป็นส่วนส าคัญที่จะท าให้การปฏิบัติหน้าที่ของผู้พพากษาได้รับความ
ิ
สะดวก รวดเร็วและเกิดประสิทธิภาพในการพจารณาพพากษาคดี โดยส่วนใหญ่การก าหนดโทษไว้ในบัญชี
ิ
มาตรฐานการลงโทษของแต่ละศาลมักจะก าหนดหรือพจารณาขึ้นตามความเหมาะสมของสภาพเหตุการณ์
ิ