Page 14 - test
P. 14

Ref  : CM-DFH4-2014-1
                                                    BEAZLEY                   Issue : 1

                                               DFH 4 Series Spacecraft        Date : 28 Sept 2014
                                                                                                Page 12 of 38



            6. LAOSAT DFHS-4S SPACECRAFT TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

                  Loasat-1               Observation                    Comment /Assessment          Cri
                               The customer is the Ministry of Posts and   Classical
                                telecommunications. The spacecraft is a DFH
                                4S, type with a Ku and C band payload.
                                Launch date Nov. 2015, OML 15 years. Bus
                                100Volts
                               The spacecraft is  a  typical  medium size  type,   Classical.with the exception of the Li Ion battery
                                with Li  ion batteries,  the  payload  is  not  too
                                complex.  Mass: 4000  kg,  dry  mass  1590  kg
                  Overview      Power: 7800 W.                                                         .
                               Module arrangement (service module and   Classical, central cylinder, U shape with N
                                payload)                            South, earth panel and antenna feed on the top
                                                                    floor.
                               Most of the hardware is under the   But  some  key  equipment  are  subcontracted
                                responsibility of CAST, some items are  outside   China  (IRES,Wheel,TWT,/TWTA
                                subcontracted.                      MIMU etc… What is the visibility they have on
                                                                    them?
                               Rockwell Collins RW, RWE          Most  of  the  subcontractors  are  located  in
                               Galileo IRES                        Europe, except COMDEV where it is not stated
                               Thales Alenia Space ETCA PCU        if it is COMDEV Europe or COMDEV Canada
                    Major      COMDEV RF Switch, Isolator, Load,   or COMDEV China or other, which nay have
                Subcontractors  Circulator                          some special rules for export control.
                               Thales Alenia Space Ku & C band Receive   The  strategy  to  flow  down  requirements  and
                                MPM, TWT...                         monitors the subcontractors is not defined.
                                                                  Who is manufacturing the WG?
                               8  54  MHz  channels  powered  by  10  for  8   Classical  Architecture. But  not  too  much
                                Radiative TWT (143 W)?              detailed are given on the equipments and on the
                  Ku Band       One (1) Rx/Tx deployable single offset antenna  evolution  of  these  equipment  since  they  have
                   payload      for c-band (West Panel)             been qualified
                                  With  the  information  provided,  the  EIRP
                                   and G/T and coverage performances seems
                                   to be compliant  with the requirements
                               14  36  MHz  channels  powered  by  18  for  14   Classical  Architecture. Question  mark  on  the
                                TWT  (75  W).  Two  TWTA  used  for  OMNI  past history (Ground and in Orbit qualification)
                                during launch                       for the 75 W TWT
                   C Band
                   payload      One (1) Rx/Tx deployable Gregorian antenna  No comment at this stage
                                for Ku-band (East Panel)
                                With  the  information  provided,  the  EIRP  and  No comment at this stage
                                G/T    nad  coverage  performances  seems  to  be
                                compliant  with the requirements.
                               Mass budget, no comment
                               Propellant budget, no comment
                               Power budget, no comment.          Non thermal prediction given. Lack of FDIR
                                                                    SPF list should be updated to assess the risk
                   System      TCR Link budget, no comment        Coherence between all the various budgets as
                   budgets                                           given for each satellite shall be reviewed and
                               Antenna pointing accuracy, no comment
                                                                           explained when different
                               Reliability, 0.7688 end of life, seems optimistic
                                with the TWT redundancy proposed.
                               SPF  list  (page  44),  seems  incomplete,  many
                                other SPF can be added.






             This document is proprietary of BEAZLEY© and must be treated on a confidential basis. It may be used solely by BEAZLEY, use or reproduction, of the document and the
                                  Contained therein, for any other purposes without BEAZLEY written consent is prohibited.
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19