Page 140 - Internal Auditing Standards
P. 140
Guide to Using International Standards on Auditing in the Audits of Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Volume 1—Core Concepts
Exhibit 11.1-1
Level of Estimation Uncertainty Involved
Low Level of Uncertainty (Less RMM) High Level of Uncertainty (Higher RMM)
Business activities that are not complex. Highly dependent upon judgment, such as the
outcome of litigation or the amount and timing of
future cash flows, dependent on uncertain events
many years in the future.
Relate to routine transactions. NOT calculated using recognized measurement
techniques.
Derived from data (referred to as “observable” in the context Results of the auditor’s review of similar accounting
of fair value accounting) that is readily available, such as estimates made in the prior period fi nancial
published interest-rate data or exchange-traded prices of statements indicate a substantial diff erence
securities.
between the original accounting estimate and the
actual outcome.
Method of measurement prescribed by the applicable Fair value accounting estimates for derivative
financial reporting framework is simple and applied easily. financial instruments are not publicly traded.
Fair value accounting estimates, where the model used to Fair value accounting estimates for which a highly
measure the accounting estimate is well known or generally specialized entity-developed model is used, or for
accepted, provided that the assumptions or inputs to the which there are assumptions or inputs that cannot
model are observable.
be observed in the marketplace
Note: The auditor (using professional judgment) is required to determine whether any of the identifi ed
accounting estimates (those having a high estimation uncertainty) give rise to significant risks. If a
significant risk is identified, the auditor is also required to obtain an understanding of the entity’s
controls, including control activities.
When the audit evidence had been obtained, the reasonableness of the estimates would be evaluated and
the extent of any misstatement identifi ed:
• Where the evidence supports a point estimate, the difference between the auditor’s point estimate and
management’s point estimate constitutes a misstatement.
• Where the auditor has concluded that using the auditor’s range of reasonableness provides suffi cient
appropriate audit evidence, a management point estimate that lies outside the auditor’s range would
not be supported by audit evidence. In such cases, the misstatement is no less than the diff erence
between management’s point estimate and the nearest point of the auditor’s range.
A difference between the outcome of an accounting estimate and the amount originally recognized or disclosed
in the financial statements does not necessarily represent a misstatement of the financial statements. This is
particularly the case for fair value accounting estimates, as any observed outcome is invariably aff ected by
events or conditions subsequent to the date at which the measurement is estimated for purposes of the fi nancial
statements.
138