Page 37 - TaxAdviser_2022
P. 37

of income, standard of living, and
           spending patterns; and          Sec. 6015(c) provides another avenue for relief
         4.  The culpable spouse’s evasiveness
           and deceit concerning the couple’s   from joint and several liability from an audit
           finances (see Hayman, 992 F.2d     assessment by making it possible to elect
           1256, 1261 (2d Cir. 1993), aff ’g                    separate liability.
           T.C. Memo. 1992-228; Butler, 114
           T.C. 276, 284 (2000)).
           As to the first factor, level of edu-  relief. A surviving spouse can make this   than two years after the date that the
         cation, it is the requesting spouse’s   election if his or her spouse died more   IRS begins collection activity (Secs.
         understanding of finances and tax, and   than 12 months before the election.   6015(b)(1)(E) and (c)(3)(B)). Regs.
         not the level of academic achievement,   If the requesting spouse is eligible   Sec. 1.6015-5(b)(2)(i) defines col-
         that is determinative of the requesting   to make this election, he or she is liable   lection activity as a Sec. 6330 notice;
         spouse’s eligibility for relief (Wang, T.C.   for the amount of tax that arises (or   an offset of a refund of the request-
         Memo. 2014-206).                  should have arisen) from the request-  ing spouse; the filing of a suit by the
           As to the second and third factors   ing spouse’s separate income and   United States against the requesting
         — involvement in the family’s financial   deductions at the time the return(s)   spouse for the collection of the joint
         affairs and level of expenditure — great   were filed. If the requesting spouse is   tax liability; or the filing of a claim by
         weight is given to whether the family’s   successful, the deficiency is allocated by   the United States in a court proceed-
         lifestyle exceeds what could be reason-  the ratio of the net amount of errone-  ing in which the requesting spouse
         ably expected from the information   ous items allocable to the requesting   is a party or that involves property
         reported on the return(s).        spouse divided by the net amount of all   of the requesting spouse. The term
           While all the facts and circumstanc-  erroneous items.            “property of the requesting spouse” is
         es are considered (Sec. 6015(d)(3)(B)),   To qualify for relief, the requesting   defined to mean property in which the
         the court holdings show that a critical   spouse must lack actual knowledge of   requesting spouse has an ownership
         concern is whether the requesting   the facts involving the erroneous item   interest (other than solely through
         spouse significantly benefited, directly   or items. The IRS has the burden of   the operation of community property
         or indirectly, from the understatement   proving actual knowledge.  laws), including property owned jointly
         of tax. A significant benefit is any   Relief will not be granted if spouses   with the nonrequesting spouse. Collec-
         benefit in excess of normal support.   transferred assets to each other as part   tion activity does not include a notice
         Mortgage payments on a middle-class   of a fraudulent scheme or to avoid tax   of deficiency, the filing of a Notice of
         home are considered normal support.   or the payment of tax. A rebuttable   Federal Tax Lien, or a demand for pay-
         The receipt of property (including life   presumption is established that an   ment of tax.
         insurance proceeds) by the requesting   asset transfer from the nonrequesting   A claim for relief can also be filed
         spouse that is beyond normal support   spouse to the requesting spouse during   once a liability is proposed during an
         and that can be traced to items omitted   the 12-month period before the mail-  examination, as part of a petition to
         from gross income and attributable to   ing date of the first letter of proposed   the U.S. Tax Court for a redetermina-
         the nonrequesting spouse, can be con-  deficiency (whether a 30-day letter or   tion of the Service’s assessment of tax,
         sidered as a significant benefit (Regs.   a notice of deficiency) is a disqualified   and as part of a Collection Due Pro-
         Sec. 1.6015-2(d)).                asset transfer, but this presumption   cess hearing.
                                           will not apply to any transfer pursu-
         Election to split or allocate the   ant to a decree of divorce or separate   A request for equitable relief
         deficiency                        maintenance or a written instrument   The third avenue that may be available
         Sec. 6015(c) provides another avenue   incident to such a decree (Sec. 6015(c)  to an unsuspecting spouse is to request
         for relief from joint and several liability   (4)(B)(ii)).          equitable relief. Sec. 6015(f) provides
         from an audit assessment by making                                  relief for unpaid tax or a deficiency
         it possible to elect separate liability. To   Time limit to seek these types    when it would be equitable to do so and
         do so, the requesting spouse must be   of relief                    when relief is unavailable under Sec.
         divorced, legally separated, or living   Both a “traditional” innocent spouse   6015(b) or (c). Significantly, this sec-
         apart from his or her spouse during the   claim and an election to split/allocate   tion provides relief for amounts owed
         12 months preceding the request for   the deficiency must be made no later   when the return was filed. The Service



         www.thetaxadviser.com                                                                January 2022  35
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42