Page 204 - TaxAdviser_Jan_Apr23_Neat
P. 204

TAX CLINIC




                                                                             before the recurring-item exception can
              For passthrough entities on the accrual                        be utilized. Each imposing jurisdiction’s
                                                                             elections should be reviewed in detail to
              method, the issue arises of whether the                        determine whether the liability is fixed
           deduction must be taken in the year the tax                       and determinable at year end.
                                                                               From John Charin, J.D., LL.M. (John.
            is paid or whether it is possible to take the                    Charin@rsmus.com); Ryan Corcoran,
                   deduction in the preceding year.                          CPA (Ryan.Corcoran@rsmus.com); and
                                                                             Kate Abdoo, J.D., LL.M. (Kate.Abdoo@
                                                                             rsmus.com), Washington, D.C.
         acceleration of a deduction for state in-  For a state income tax liability, the
         come tax payments. A taxpayer utilizing   regulations provide that the match-
         an accrual method is generally allowed   ing requirement of the recurring-item   Tax Accounting
         a deduction for a liability when all   exception is deemed satisfied. Thus,
         events occur to establish the fact of the   under the recurring-item exception, an   Assessing the need for a
         liability, the amount of the liability can   accrual-basis taxpayer generally may ac-  valuation allowance
         be determined with reasonable accuracy,   celerate the deduction for state income   Over the past decade or so, financial
         and economic performance occurs with   taxes to the year prior to payment,   reporting under GAAP has become
         respect to the liability. For state income   notwithstanding the general economic   more mechanical or formulaic, with the
         taxes, Regs. Sec. 1.461-4(g)(6) provides   performance rules under Sec. 461.  goal of increasing consistency among
         that economic performance occurs as the   While not certain, the notice does   financial statement preparers. Yet, pro-
         tax is paid to the governmental authority   not appear to change any general rules   fessional judgment remains a critical
         that imposed the tax.             or regulations under Sec. 461, so it   skill in preparing and auditing financial
           Thus, accrual-method taxpayers may   stands to reason that, provided the re-  statements, even though the trend in
         generally deduct state income taxes in the   quirements of the recurring-item excep-  financial reporting may appear to lessen
         year paid, similar to a cash-basis taxpayer.   tion are met, an accrual-basis taxpayer   the need for it.
         However, a special rule exists under Regs.   should be able to utilize this exception   A key part of accounting for income
         Sec. 1.461-5 for accrual-basis taxpayers   to deduct a specified income tax pay-  taxes under FASB Accounting Stan-
         regarding the timing of a deduction for   ment in the tax year accrued, even if   dards Codification (ASC) Topic 740,
         certain recurring items, such as state   payment is made in the subsequent year.  Income Taxes, that requires significant
         income taxes. This is known as the   There are some important consid-  professional judgment is evaluating the
         recurring-item exception.         erations to keep in mind if a taxpayer   need for a valuation allowance. The
                                           wishes to use the recurring-item excep-  valuation allowance reduces a com-
         The recurring-item exception      tion for these specified income tax   pany’s deferred tax assets (DTAs) to the
         Under this special method of accounting,   payments. First, the recurring-item   amount more likely than not to be real-
         an accrual-basis taxpayer may deduct a   exception is a method of accounting.   ized. This analysis requires thoroughly
         qualified item in the tax year preceding the   Passthrough entity taxpayers should   evaluating all positive and negative evi-
         actual year of payment, provided that at the   review their prior income tax return   dence available and includes objective,
         end of that tax year:             filings and determine if a method   subjective, and mechanical elements.
         ■   All events have occurred that establish   of accounting has been established   A general starting point in the valu-
           the fact of the liability and the amount   for the deduction of state income   ation allowance assessment is to look
           of the liability can be determined with   taxes. If not, taxpayers can adopt the   at the company’s three-year cumula-
           reasonable accuracy;            recurring-item exception the first time   tive pretax book losses or earnings.
         ■   Payment occurs on or before 8½   they incur the item. If a “deduct when   Companies that show a strong his-
           months after the end of the tax year;   paid” method has been established for   tory of earnings demonstrate positive
         ■   The liability is recurring in nature; and   income taxes, taxpayers may be able to   evidence that a valuation allowance is
         ■   Either the amount of the liability   make an automatic accounting method   not needed. Likewise, the guidance in
           is not material or the accrual of the   change to begin applying the recurring-  ASC Paragraph 740-10-30-23 states:
           liability for that tax year results in   item exception.          “A cumulative loss in recent years is a
           better matching of the liability with   Second, the fixed and determinable   significant piece of negative evidence
           the income to which it relates.   prongs of the all-events test must be met   that is difficult to overcome.” While



         24  April 2023                                                                       The Tax Adviser
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209