Page 209 - Volume 2_CHANGES_merged_with links
P. 209

Obstacles to progress


                                                                                                   Realities

                  “ To this day, economists can point to few, if any, examples of substantial economic growth

                  among the LDCs under SAPs. Moreover, very few of the loans have been paid off. Pressure
                  mounts to forgive these debts, some of which demand substantial portions of government

                  expenditures to service.
                                                           ***
                  Since SAPs are based on the condition that loans have to be repaid in hard currency,
                  economies were restructured to focus on exports as the only source for developing countries
                  to obtain such currency. For the inward-oriented economies it was therefore mandatory to

                  switch their entire production from what was domestically eaten, worn or used towards goods
                  that industrialized countries were interested in.

                  However, as dozens of countries underwent this restructuration process simultaneously and
                  often were told to focus on similar primary goods, the situation resembled a large-scale price

                  war: Developing countries had to compete against each other, causing massive worldwide
                  over-production and deteriorating world market prices.

                  While this was beneficial for Western consumers, developing countries lost 52% of their
                  revenues from exports between 1980 and 1992 because of the decline in prices.
                  Furthermore, debtor states were often encouraged to specialize in a single cash crop, like

                  cocoa in Ghana, tobacco in Zimbabwe and prawns in the Philippines, which made them highly
                  vulnerable to fluctuations in the world market price of these crops.

                  The other main criticism against the compelled integration of developing countries into the
                  global market implied that their industries were not economically or socially stable and
                  therefore not ready to compete internationally.

                  After all, the industrialized countries had engaged in the free trade of goods only after they had
                  developed a more mature industrial structure which they had built up behind high protective

                  tariffs and subsidies for domestic industries. Consequently, the very conditions under which
                  industrialized countries had developed, grown and prospered in the past were now discouraged
                  by the IMF through its SAPs.

                                                           ***
                  There are multiple criticisms that focus on different elements of SAPs. There are many

                  examples of structural adjustments failing. In Africa, instead of making economies grow fast,
                  structural adjustment actually had a contractive impact in most countries. Economic growth in

                  African countries in the 1980s and 1990s fell below the rates of previous decades. Agriculture
                  suffered as state support was radically withdrawn. After independence of African countries in

                  the 1960s, industrialization had begun in some places, but it was now wiped out
                                                           ***
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214