Page 212 - Volume 2_CHANGES_merged_with links
P. 212

Obstacles to progress


                                                                                                   Realities

                  rising critical reform needs in shared (e.g., labor and product market reforms) and non-core

                  areas
                                                           ***
                  Lower program completion rates suggest increasing ownership issues, as politically complex
                  structural challenges intensified. Strong ownership occurred where programs incorporated

                  national reform plans, there was a robust communication strategy, and/or implementation
                  capacity was strong
                                                           ***
                  To improve program success and reduce risks, certain trade-offs in program design need to be
                  re-assessed. These include the trade-offs between realism and ambition; granularity and

                  flexibility; gradualism and speed; parsimony and more conditionality; and in some cases,
                  between debt operations and fiscal adjustment. The RoC suggests a move toward more

                  realism, granularity, gradualism, and parsimony in programs, as well as sharper DSAs to
                  mitigate any bias in judgment and ensure more balanced consideration of debt operations,

                  where warranted. “
                                                    2018 REVIEW OF PROGRAM DESIGN AND CONDITIONALITY       260
                                                                             INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND

                                                          *****
                  The Effects of Structural Adjustment Programs on Poverty and Income Distribution
                  “ Propensity score matching does not show significant effects of SAPs on poverty indicators.
                  Using Heckman regressions we find evidence that participation in IMF programs is connected

                  to higher poverty rates and a more unequal income distribution. These results stay robust after
                  controlling for other economic variables.

                                                           ***
                  This paper gives evidence that IMF programs tend to harm countries in terms of poverty levels

                  and income distribution. Rich people seem to profit from the participation in IMF programs,
                  poor people seem to lose, falling even deeper into poverty. One of the arguments of the IMF is

                  that, although there might be a negative impact on poverty levels in the short run, the situation
                  tends to improve in the long run. It does not disclose however, how long IMF programs need to
                  show positive outcomes “

                               "The Effects of Structural Adjustment Programs on Poverty and Income Distribution,"    261
                                                                                        Oberdabernig, Doris A.

                                                          *****
                  Conditionality
                  “ Recent academic studies and reviews have found mixed evidence on learning outcomes in
                  education PPPs, and no evidence that they consistently perform better than public schools.7
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217