Page 269 - Volume 2_CHANGES_merged_with links
P. 269

Obstacles to progress


                                                                                                 Distortions


                  system....They explained to me that for 10 years, all those years they were fighting and
                  the West didn't want to hear about their war. It was only after they started to amputate

                  people, more people and more people, that the international community was taking
                  notice of their war. Those simple rebel soldiers in Africa could explain to me how that aid
                  system works. That alarmed me....

                  A Security Council report this year concluded that up to half of the World Food program
                  money -- $485 million per year -- for Somalia is diverted from the people who actually

                  need it, to a web of corrupt contractors, Islamic militants, and local UN staff members
                  who are also involved in this scheme. We can shrug our shoulders about $245 million a
                  year, but in Somalia, this is a lot of money and it is fueling conflict, and it is fuelling the

                  wrong people. “
                                                                                      "The Case against Aid."   318
                                                                                             Stockman, Farah.
                                                                                Boston Globe (September 2010)

                                                          *****

                  “ We show that food aid has little effect on the onset of conflicts, but significantly
                  increases their  duration
                                                           ***
                  Governments that receive aid often target it to specific populations, excluding opposition
                  groups or populations in potentially rebellious regions. This has been noted to increase

                  hostilities and promote conflict.
                                                           ***
                  Our findings show that the concerns of critics are very real and that US food aid indeed

                  promotes civil conflict on average. An increase in US food aid increases the incidence of
                  armed civil conflict in recipient countries. US food aid does not crowd out other forms of
                  aid or aid from other donors.

                  Thus, the increase in conflict is really due to an increase in aid.
                                                           ***
                  we also find that the adverse effects of food aid are concentrated among countries with
                  a recent history of civil conflict. “

                                                                               "US Food Aid and Civil Conflict.   319
                                                                                 Nunn, Nathan, and Nancy Qian.
                                                    American Economic Review 104, no. 6 (June 1, 2014): 1630–66.

                                                          *****
                  “ According to our estimates, an increase in US food aid increases the incidence and

                  duration of civil conflicts, but has no robust effect on interstate conflicts or the onset of
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274