Page 223 - Volume 1_Go home mzungu Go Home_merged with links
P. 223

ɡ




                                                             21  century m'zuŋ u ‘neo-colonialism’



                                                                st

                                                                              Control through Dependency
                  The actuality might pivot on whether it develops a ‘uniqueness’ that allows African
            leaders to see the EU as being ‘independent’ from the USA / USA policy influenced BWI, and
            a softer, less ‘threatening’ partner than China and Russia.

                  The EU has the potential to also breakthrough the negativity Africans hold towards
            ex-colonial powers. But less so given the way France, which is very much at the centre of

            EU affairs, still holds onto a FrancAfrique approach.
                                                     ***** ***** *****
            The USA

            USA involvement in African matters will continue but will shrink. That process has been
            underway for some 20 years or more.

                  The USA will not fade away. It will still be an important economy. But nation after

            nation remembers the bruising they suffered when the USA was at its peak. One of the
            reasons why African nations have scrambled towards Chinese ODI (Outbound Direct

            Investment) is because it provides African governments some escape from USA

            interference. Africa is and will continue to move away from the USA.
                  The USA is an exemplar of how Empires sew the seeds of their own demise.

            Post-World War II, USA's approach to foreign policy paralleled that of the Roman Empire at

            its height.
                  Make your homeland a fortress that no one can attack and use the provinces beyond

            as the 'bread basket' to feed your people safely ensconced in your fortress homeland.
                  Then deliberately fight wars on the edges of your Empire, a long way from your

            fortress homeland. These faraway wars will suck out the strength of your enemy and

            further diminish their capacity to attack your fortress homeland. And they also provide the
            opportunities for wealth creation. Not just in the capture of assets, but also in terms of

            new markets and contracts for 'reconstruction'.

                  And between your fortress homeland and these faraway border wars, create where
            you can puppet states, proxy states, and the like. These are a much cheaper way to control

            these countries. (And yes, as most of the rest of the world will tell you, the UK is simply one of USA's proxy
            states.)
                  The demise of an Empire comes out of its very success.

            Keeping people in comparative riches, insulated inside your somewhat detached fortress

            homeland, leads to generation after generation having high expectations whilst being
   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228