Page 32 - FREN-C2021 PROCEEDINGS
P. 32

NGOs play a critical role in providing a check and balance to the government agency (Thomas, 2001;
               Lux  &  Straussman,  2004;  Collingwood,  2006;  Forteza  &  Pereyra,  2017).  For  example,  the
               government  has  developed  a  system  on  learning  disability  policy.  The  NGO’s  role  is  to  promote
               change  or  improve  equality  policies  (Whitehead  et  al.,  2008).  Within  this  context,  NGOs  are  the
               separate  entities  to  scrutinise  the  government  agency’s  policy  and  actions.  As  part  of  check  and
               balance, Lewis and Kanji (2009) claim that NGOs can act as a catalyst to a government agency by
               inspiring, facilitating, or contributing to better ideas and action for sustainable system development.
               For  example,  one  of  the  government  agency  agendas  is  to  address  homelessness  and  poverty
               eradication in Malaysia (Rusenko, 2014.) This agenda requires cooperation with NGOs like National
               Welfare Foundation Malaysia to cater to the homeless people’s primary needs and address the issues
               of  poverty  (Oria,  2015). This  agenda  is  closely  associated  with  the  growth  of societies  and  social
               consciousness, of which it is the primary role for NGOs. Thus, NGOs roles as a catalyst are seen as
               critical to the extent the government works and achieves their agendas.

               There are two primary groups of NGOs in Malaysia which is (1) states and (2) autonomous NGOs
               (Alatas, 2003). The state NGOs established by the state aim to implement and represent government
               policies  (Christie,  2012).  National  Council  of  Women’s  Organisations,  Malaysia  (NCWO)  is  an
               example of state NGOs established by the Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development,
               which focuses on women’s welfare and promoting equality to women working in the states. The states
               NGOs  commonly  depend  on  the  financial  states,  and  some  of  them  applied  for  corporate  and
               individual  or  public  funds  to  support  their  operation.  On  the  other  hand,  autonomous  NGOs  are
               created by individuals or groups of people that primarily focus voluntarily to support the societies
               development  and  demonstrate  public  interest  (Schiavo-Campo  &  Sundaram,  2000;  Jie,  2006).  An
               example of autonomous NGOs is the Muslim  Youth Movement of Malaysia’s (ABIM  – Angkatan
               Belia  Islam),  aiming  to  enhance  its  religious  legitimacy  and  promote  Islamic  religion  through  its
               charity work. The primary funding sources for autonomous NGOs are the corporate fund, individual
               or public fund. Nevertheless, the autonomous NGOs also applied for financial states to support their
               operations. Although the primary funding sources for state and autonomous NGOs differ, they rely
               substantially on the donors funding, including the governments, corporations, and individuals or the
               public, to support their operations.

                                                     Donor Funding
               The funding is typically used for the NGOs’ operations cost including administrative costs (staff’s
               salaries, the cost of renting a building, and company’s vehicles) and the cost for programs conducted
               by NGOs (Lewis, 2001; Weiss & Hassan, 2003; Silverman & Patterson, 2011; Soakell-Ho & Myers,
               2011; Nga, 2015; Mutinda & Ngahu, 2016; Masdar, Kadir & Bahar, 2017). There are two funding
               sources that the NGOs’ can acquire, which are internal and external. The internal funding sources
               come from the NGOs’ initiative to acquire funding, whereas the external funding sources come from
               other agencies, individuals or groups outside the NGOs. NGOs across countries, including Malaysia,
               primarily  rely  on  external sources  for funding,  called  donors (e.g.  government and  corporation)  to
               support their operation (Hasnan et al., 2012; Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014; Nga, 2015; Kassim & Taib,
               2016).

               NGOs’ dependency on donor funding aligns with the resource dependency theory (RDT) by Pfeffer
               and Salancik (1978). The basic assumption of RDT is that  “dependence on critical and important
               resources influences the actions of organisations and that organisational decisions and actions can be
               explained  depending  on  the  particular  dependency  situation”  (Pfeffer  &  Salancik,  1978).  RDT
               explains  that  the  organisation  has  to  minimise  the  dependency  on  the  external  source.  For  NGOs
               context, NGOs largely depend on the donors funding to support their operation. The dependency on
               donors (i.e., considered as the primary external sources of funding) would impact NGOs’ operation
               and the possibility of dissolution. Considering this situation, it indirectly impacts the development of
               government agencies and corporations in which the role of NGOs is vital to them. Thus, this paper


                                                           [27]
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37