Page 155 - Veterinary Toxicology, Basic and Clinical Principles, 3rd Edition
P. 155

122 SECTION | I General




  VetBooks.ir            TABLE 7.8 Prohibited Substances in the European Union


                                                                  Toxicological End Points
                         Substances
                         Aristolochia spp. and preparations thereof  Nephrotoxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity
                         Chloramphenicol                          Aplastic anemia, carcinogenicity
                         Chloroform                               Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity (lack of data)
                         Chlorpromazine                           Behavioral changes
                         Colchicine                               Genotoxicity
                         Dapsone                                  Reproductive and teratogenic effects
                         Dimetridazole                            Reproductive and teratogenic effects
                         Metronidazole                            Mutagenicity
                         Nitrofurans (including furazolidone)     Carcinogenicity
                         Ronidazole                               Mutagenicity




             toxicological ADI from the determination of a NOAEL/  issue that needs to be addressed for veterinary antimicro-
             LOAEL and application of an appropriate safety factor  bial drugs is the safety of their residues on the human
             provide hazard identification and characterization. The  intestinal flora. The objectives of this guideline are (1) to
             toxicological ADI approach takes into account effects  outline the steps in determining the need for establishing
             based on classical toxicology. The safety factor usually  a mADI; (2) to recommend test systems and methods for
             chosen is 100 in the situation where a NOAEL is derived  determining NOAECs and NOAELs for the endpoints of
             from a long-term animal study on the assumptions that  health concern; and (3) to recommend a procedure to
             humans are 10 times as sensitive as the test animals used  derive a microbiological ADI.
             in such studies and that a 10-fold range of sensitivity  The mADI and the toxicological ADI calculations
             within the human population may exist. Data on human  conservatively assume that the amount and concentration
             variation in the major pathways of foreign compound  (chronic daily ingestion) of veterinary drug residue in the
             metabolism and pharmacological sensitivity have shown  colon are the same daily. Recently, there have been ques-
             that the 10-fold factor is a reasonable default value (FAO/  tions regarding the applicability of the mADI calculation
             WHO, 2014). JECFA for certain substances has estab-  for purposes of assessing a single, acute residue dose
             lished acute reference dose (ARfD) based on pharmaco-  exposure that is also addressed as a component of the
             logical end-points.                                human food safety assessment of veterinary drug use.
                There are very potent compounds that exert pharmaco-  Acute residue dose (ARD) exposure is a one-time event
             logical actions through receptor pathways at very low  (e.g., ingestion would be consumption of edible tissue
             doses; the consequences are very low ADI (or reference  containing the injection site of the drug administered to
             dose) values for human dietary consumption. The pharma-  the treated animal), not the chronic daily ingestion
             cological ADI was derived for other compounds such as  assumed in derivation of an ADI or a mADI. In such
             beta-agonists,  beta-blockers,  anesthetics,  tranquillizers,  cases, an acute residue dose exposure of the intestinal
             vasodilators, and compounds that may trigger acute hyper-  microbiome to a drug is different from the chronic daily
             sensitivity reactions (e.g., penicillins) and for certain sub-  ingestion exposure assumed to establish the mADI and
             stances it has established ARfDs based on pharmacological  that the most relevant microbiological end-point for acute
             end-points. The β-adrenergic agonists are an example so  exposure would most likely be disruption of the coloniza-
             JECFAreviewof the β-adrenergic agonist ractopamine HCl  tion barrier (FDA, 2013; Cerniglia et al., 2016).
             resulted in a recommendation of an ADI of 0 1 μg/kg  The bolus of drug contained in the ARD meal is
             body weight/day and MRL of 10 μg/kg of muscle with  loaded and diluted into an intestinal tract that contains no
             higher values in liver and kidney. In contrast, this  comparable high levels of ingested residue. This temporal
             β-adrenergic agonist is not authorized in the EU because no  dilution must be taken into consideration of one-time con-
             ADI or MRL have been set.                          sumption of an ARD that is not taken into account in the
                The ADI can also be determined from microbiological  current derivation of a mADI based on in vitro data. This
             data for substances with microbiological activity. An  is in contrast to the assumption for the chronic daily (ADI
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160