Page 397 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 397

CHAPTER 20  Melanoma    375



                                    P                                                   P

  VetBooks.ir










            L                                                R  L                                               R












             A                                                  B
                                     A                                                  A
                           • Fig. 20.10  (A) Postcontrast axial CT image of a dog with a maxillary oral melanoma. Note the hetero-
                           geneously contrast enhancing soft tissue mass (arrow). Precontrast axial image at the same level as the
                           image in (A). (B) Note the bone destruction of the maxillary bone and the invasion of the soft tissue mass
                           into the nasal cavity (arrow).

           of dogs with MM. Overall response rates for dogs with measur-  Immunotherapy represents one potential systemic therapeu-
           able disease are largely disappointing, especially with single-agent   tic strategy for the adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma.
           dacarbazine, melphalan, vinorelbine, or doxorubicin, 147–150  with   A variety of immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of
           the highest reported response rates response being 18% for dogs   human melanoma have been reported with typically poor out-
           treated with cisplatin and piroxicam 151  and 28% for dogs treated   comes because of a lack of breaking tolerance. Immunotherapy
           with carboplatin. 152  Furthermore, the majority of responses are   targets and strategies to date in canine melanoma have used
           short lived. More recently and importantly, five retrospective   autologous tumor cell vaccines (with or without transfection with
           studies investigating the role of chemotherapy in the adjuvant set-  immunostimulatory cytokines and/or melanosomal differentiation
           ting after either surgery or RT found no significant differences   antigens); allogeneic tumor cell vaccines transfected with interleu-
           in outcomes with the addition of chemotherapy to the treatment   kin-2 (IL-2) or granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor
           protocol. 104,107,127,139,153  Other nonimmunologic antiprolifera-  (GM-CSF);  liposomal-encapsulated  nonspecific  immunostimu-
           tive and/or prodifferentiation approaches have included lupeol   lators (e.g.. L-MTP-PE); intralesional Fas ligand DNA; siRNA
           or targeting SET/I2PP2A, proteasomes, and SINE (selective   (small interfering) against the survivin and/or Bcl-2 genes; bacte-
           inhibitor of nuclear export). 154–158  Although it can be effectively   rial superantigen approaches with GM-CSF or IL-2 as immune
           argued that the studies performed to date to evaluate the activity   adjuvants; polyethylene glycol (PEG) ylated TNF-no suicide gene
           of chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting for canine melanoma have   therapy; adenovector CD40 ligand; chondroitin sulfate proteo-
           been suboptimal for a variety of reasons, the human literature is   glycan 4 (CSPG4); IL-12; interferon-beta (IFN-beta); and lastly
           extensive and this suggests melanoma is an extremely chemother-  canine dendritic cell vaccines loaded with melanosomal differ-
           apy-resistant tumor. 135,159  It is clear that new approaches to the   entiation antigens. 17,158,169–189  Although these approaches have
           systemic treatment of this disease are desperately needed.  produced some clinical antitumor responses, the methodologies
             One potential clinical therapy avenue that has been minimally   for the generation of these products are often expensive, time con-
           reported on to date in canine or feline melanoma is the use of   suming, sometimes dependent on patient tumor samples being
           cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors. A number of authors have   established into cell lines, and fraught with the difficulties of
           investigated the expression of COX-2 and neurokinin-1 (NK-1) in   consistency, reproducibility, and other quality control issues, and
           canine melanoma and/or melanoma cell lines and found positive   none are currently commercially available. Furthermore, we now
           correlations of expression to proliferation and survival. 79,160–165    more fully understand the native immune dysregulation poten-
           Studies investigating the clinical responsiveness of canine mela-  tially induced by the malignancy through increased T regulatory
           noma to COX-2 inhibitors (and potential correlation to COX-2   (Treg) cells that suppress antitumor responses. 190–193
           expression)  and/or NK-1 antagonists,  such as maropitant, are   The  advent  of  DNA  vaccination  circumvents many  of the
           required. Other modalities reported for local tumor control as case   previously encountered hurdles in vaccine development. DNA is
           reports and/or case series include intralesional cisplatin implants,   relatively inexpensive and simple to purify in large quantities. The
           intralesional bleomycin with electronic pulsing, and many others,   antigen of interest is cloned into a bacterial expression plasmid
           but widespread use has not been reported to date. 166–168  with a constitutively active promoter. The plasmid is introduced
   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402