Page 629 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 629

CHAPTER 28  Tumors of the Mammary Gland  607


           from molecular classification to inform precise and patient-spe-  disease, 105,106  incorporation of human LN staging techniques
           cific treatment recommendations in canine MGTs, similar to the   should be reconsidered for the dog. 107  Sentinel LN mapping is a
                                                                 means of detecting which LNs are receiving draining tumor lymph
           approach in human BC therapy. 
  VetBooks.ir                                                    and thus most at risk for metastasis. Some techniques described
                                                                 for sentinel LN mapping in the dog include lymphoscintigraphy
           History and Clinical Presentation
                                                                 using technetium, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, autog-
           MGTs are usually easy to detect through routine physical exami-  enous hemosiderin, computed tomographic indirect lymphogra-
           nations; however, high-risk dogs, specifically older intact female   phy, and intraoperative dyes (Fig. 28.2). 103,104,107–111  Clinically
           dogs, should undergo a thorough examination of the MGs. MGTs   normal LNs can be difficult to identify in dogs with MGTs, as
           typically affect the two caudal glands where the MGs or tissues   the axillary LNs are often not palpable and the superficial inguinal
           are naturally larger; thus careful palpation may be necessary to   LNs reside deep to the fifth MG in the inguinal fat pad. Further-
           detect small tumors. 9,14,66,67  The MGs should be palpated again   more, many dogs have more than one tumor; thus multiple LNs
           under general anesthesia to ensure that all tumors are found and   may represent draining LNs. Lymphatic drainage of normal MGs
           included in the surgical planning, and both chains should be care-  is in addition very complex with documented drainage occurring
           fully evaluated. A recent study documented that 70% of intact   to multiple ipsilateral LNs and even to contralateral LNs. 104,112,113
                                               15
           females had more than one MGT at diagnosis.  The size of the   The amount of variation in lymphatic drainage increases in the
           tumor(s), stage of disease, and presence of systemic signs of illness   neoplastic MG. 112  Tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis, well docu-
           vary widely. Inflammatory mammary carcinomas represent a rare   mented in human BC, may be responsible for the unpredictable
           but clinically important subset of MGTs in dogs. Affected dogs   and erratic location of susceptible or “at-risk” LNs in dogs having
           may easily be misdiagnosed as having mastitis or severe dermatitis   malignant MGTs. 114  Thus exclusive anatomic sampling of nearby
           because, rather than presenting with discrete well-circumscribed   LNs may not be sufficient for accurate LN staging and may miss
           tumors, the entire mammary chain may appear edematous, swol-  the presence of locoregional disease. 107
           len, warm, and painful (Fig. 28.1). 101,102  In addition to the exten-  The first description of sentinel LN mapping in any animal was
           sive locoregional involvement, most dogs with inflammatory   done in cats almost 30 years ago. 115  Benefits in human medicine
           carcinomas have distant metastatic disease and signs of systemic   include greater ease in identifying the at-risk LNs intraoperatively
           illness. 101,102   These  dogs  are  therefore  poor  surgical  candidates.   with minimal surgical incisions and with efficiency, especially for
           The majority of dogs with MGTs are systemically healthy and the   the rarely assessed axillary nodes. The prognostic value of sentinel
           tumors are confined to the MGs when they are diagnosed.   LN mapping is currently unknown for the dog, 116  although a study
                                                                 of computed tomographic indirect lymphography found imaging
           Clinical Assessment, Diagnosis, Workup, and           characteristics of sentinel LNs positive for histologic mammary
                                                                 tumor metastasis having decreased or heterogeneous LN contrast
           Staging                                               enhancement compared with the homogeneous contrast enhance-
           Because of the risk of metastasis associated with MGTs, staging   ment pattern of sentinel LNs negative for histologic metastasis. 103
           before initiating therapy is strongly recommended, especially if   Abdominal ultrasound may be indicated in dogs with sus-
           benign disease cannot be histologically confirmed. Minimal diag-  pected regional LN involvement or changes on preoperative
           nostic workup and staging can include complete blood count   blood work suggesting tumor-related or non–tumor-related
           (CBC), serum biochemistry, three-view thoracic radiographs, and   serum biochemistry changes. Even though osseous metaplasia
           fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of regional lymph nodes (LNs) or   occurs occasionally with mammary adenocarcinoma and the
           more accurately, sentinel LN mapping and biopsy (see Chapter   MGs are a common site for extraskeletal osteosarcoma (OSA),
           9). 103,104  In women, the use of sentinel LN mapping has dramati-  there has been no prognostic value found for serum alkaline
           cally altered the surgical treatment of BC. As canine mammary   phosphatase  activity. 117,118   There  may  be  value  in  perform-
           carcinoma has been demonstrated as a relevant model for human   ing MGT cytology to help rule out nonmammary dermal
























           •  Fig.  28.1  Inflammatory mammary carcinoma in a dog. (Courtesy Dr.   •  Fig. 28.2  Regional mastectomy in a dog. (Courtesy Dr. Julius Liptak,
           Nicholas Bacon, Fitzpatrick Referrals, Guildford, United Kingdom.)  VCA Canada—Alta Vista Animal Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.)
   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634