Page 627 - Withrow and MacEwen's Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 6th Edition
P. 627

CHAPTER 28  Tumors of the Mammary Gland  605


           significant benefit after 4 years of age. According to Schneider’s   some found underexpression of  BRCA1 in malignant tumors
           original study, the risk increases and the benefit diminishes with   and others have documented overexpression of BRCA2 in meta-
                                                                               Germline polymorphisms in both BRCA1 and
                                                                           35,36
           each estrus cycle, as illustrated by an increasing risk of 8% and
                                                                 static tumors.
  VetBooks.ir  26% depending on whether the OHE was performed before   BRCA2 were associated with significantly increased risk in English
                                                                 springer spaniels in a large Swedish study.
                                                                                                 3,17
           the second or third heat cycle.  No significant risk reduction
                                   18
                                                                                                    
           was seen in dogs spayed after 2.5 years of age, although other
           researchers have found some modest benefit in dogs spayed later.   Other Risk Factors
           These studies were all retrospective case-control studies. 14,19,20    Body weight, specifically during puberty (9–12 months), is found
           A recent prospective randomized study, however, documented   to have a significant effect on later MGT risk; being underweight
           significant decreased risk for new tumor development by per-  during this time period provides significant protection against later
           forming OHE concurrent with tumor removal in dogs with   tumor development.  This study did not find an increased risk for
                                                                                19
           benign MGTs.  Notably, these dogs were older, with a mean   tumors in dogs fed a high-fat diet or dogs that were obese around
                      21
           age of 9 years, confirming that hormonal deprivation via OHE   the time of tumor detection; however, a subsequent case-control
           later in life significantly decreases the risk for new tumor devel-  study did document an association between diet and mammary
           opment. Nevertheless, the greatest benefit on MGT prevention   cancer in which obesity early in life and a diet high in red meat
           is seen if the dog is not allowed to go through any heat cycles,   were found to increase risk.  Obesity has also been recognized as
                                                                                      37
           suggesting that some of the initial effects of ovarian hormones   a risk factor for developing postmenopausal BC in women. 38,39
           on the MGs in terms of cancer risk occur early in life, likely   One of the proposed mechanisms by which diet/obesity may be
           during puberty when the MG develops and matures. Other fac-  linked to breast carcinogenesis is via its effect on serum estrogen
           tors resulting in physiologic variation in hormonal influence on   levels. Obesity is associated with decreased concentration of sex
           the mammary tissues, such as pseudopregnancy, pregnancy, or   hormone–binding globulin and thus results in elevated serum free
           parity, which typically occur after a few estrus cycles, have not   estrogen levels. 40–44  In addition, adipose tissues may be a source
           been found to significantly influence the tumor risk, but none   of increased estrogen production via aromatase-mediated conver-
           of these studies were controlled or randomized. 14,18,22  Expo-  sion of androgens. Interestingly, the mammary cancer–sparing
           sure to exogenous or pharmacologic doses of hormones (both   influence of being underweight is most significant during the first
           progestins and estrogens) has been found to increase the risk   year of life, when the effects of the endogenous hormones are the
           for developing MGTs in dogs. Dogs treated with progestins are   greatest. 
                                                     20
           more likely to develop tumors and at a younger age.  Accord-
           ing to the Norwegian Canine Cancer Registry, dogs treated with   Tumor Biology: Development, Hormones,
           progestins to prevent estrus had a 2.3-fold higher risk for MGTs
           compared with dogs not receiving such treatment.  Similarly, a   Growth Factors, and Clinical Implications
                                                  23
           Dutch study found that privately owned dogs with MGTs were   Based on the previous discussion of risk factors, it is clear that
                                                     20
           significantly more likely to have received progestins.  Numer-  exposure to ovarian hormones is important in the development
           ous studies have investigated the effect of dose, duration, and   of MGTs in dogs. Both estrogens and progesterone are necessary
           type of hormones (progestins, estrogens, or a combination of   for normal MG development and maturation. The MGs undergo
           both) on MGT development in laboratory dogs. Although some   distinct clinical and histopathologic changes as hormone levels
           discordance exists, most conclude that low-dose progestins alone   fluctuate according to the phases of the estrus cycle. 45,46  Estrogens
           increase the risk for predominantly benign tumors, whereas a   and progesterone are mitogens of breast epithelium and induce
           combination of estrogens and progestins tends to induce malig-  proliferation of intralobular ductal epithelium and development
           nant tumors. 24–28                                    of ducts and lobules, resulting in expansion of the MGs. His-
                                                                 torically, the tumorigenic effects of estrogen in human BC were
           Breeds and Genetic Susceptibility                     thought to be mediated via their receptor binding and enhanced
           In general, MGTs tend to be more common in the smaller breeds.   production of growth factors resulting in increased cellular pro-
                                             1
                                                                        47
           Purebred dogs are more commonly affected ; poodles, Chihua-  liferation ; however, more recent research shows that estrogen
           huas, dachshunds, Yorkshire terriers, Maltese, and cocker span-  and its metabolites also have direct genotoxic effects by increas-
           iels are frequently listed as high-risk breeds in the small-breed   ing mutations and induction of aneuploidy independent of the
           category. 1,2,16,29  However, some of the larger breeds are also at   estrogen receptors. 48–50  The tumorigenic effects of progesterone
           increased risk, including the English springer spaniel, English set-  are in part thought to be mediated via a progesterone-induced
           ters, Brittany spaniels, German shepherds, pointers, Doberman   increased MG production of growth hormone (GH) and GH
           pinschers,  and  boxers. 1–3,16,29   Some  noteworthy  discrepancies   receptors. 51–53  GH has direct stimulatory effects on mammary tis-
           exist, specifically between the US and European reports. Boxers   sues and indirect effects via increasing insulin-like growth factor-1
                                                                       54
           are noted to have a decreased risk for MGTs according to data   (IGF-1).  The GH/IGF-1 axis has been implicated in human
           from the University of Pennsylvania, whereas Scandinavian stud-  breast carcinogenesis. IGF-1 is both a proproliferative and a sur-
           ies reflect an increased risk in boxers. 2,3,16  A closed population   vival factor for breast epithelial cells and regulates the expression
           beagle study showed that two different lines or families of beagles   of numerous genes involved in BC development. 55–60  The com-
           have very different MGT risks.  These results collectively support   plex dysregulation of growth factors and hormones that precedes,
                                  30
           a genetic influence on MGT development. Familial or inherited   initiates, and potentially drives canine mammary tumorigenesis is
           germline mutations in  BRCA1 and  BRCA2 account for 5% to   far from understood; evidence exists indicating that both growth
           10% of all human breast cancers (BCs) and are associated with an   factors and steroid hormones are intrinsically implicated and con-
           85% cumulative lifetime risk of BC in affected individuals. 31–34    tribute in an autocrine/paracrine manner. Malignant tumors have
           Studies of BRCA mutations in canine MGTs have so far been lim-  significantly higher tissue concentrations of GH, IGF-1, proges-
           ited to tumor gene expression studies and the results have varied;   terone, and 17β-estradiol than benign tumors; moreover, levels
   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632