Page 153 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 153

7.3  Two‐way Communication  125

  VetBooks.ir  the animal’s body language provides feedback   the  target  forward  the  lion snarled  and
                                                      aggressed repeatedly with feet hitting the
             about its level of motivation to participate or
             not. If the body language shows the animal is
                                                      no more than one foot, the lion stopped the
             not motivated, the trainer can change the   wire mesh. As soon as the keeper backed up
             antecedents and/or consequences to encour-  aggression and sat calmly in the presence of
             age the animal, or stop the training session   the keeper. Those 12 inches made a world of
             and try again later. When cues and criteria for   difference in the attention span and motiva-
             behaviour are clear, the animal may learn   tion of the lion.
             quicker and motivation may increase. When   A trainer can have a high trust account
             animals don’t learn as expected, a trainer   with a particular animal then one day, with
             should review antecedent conditions includ-  no apparent reason from the trainer’s point
             ing cues, criteria, and reinforcers.     of view, the animal might retreat at the train-
               The most successful animal trainers are often   er’s approach. Though we will never know
             the ones who are the most sensitive to animals’   what an animal is thinking, we can observe
             body language. As a trainer approaches an ani-  what the animal does. When an animal’s
             mal’s enclosure there is an important opportu-  body language shows distrust or concern, a
             nity for the trainer to observe the animal’s body   trainer should stop what he or she is doing,
             language and determine the most helpful speed   quickly evaluate the conditions, and move
             of approach, or if approach is even advisable.   back to the animal’s comfort zone. No matter
             Too often, keepers just march up to a training   how high the trust account or how much his-
             area with little or no concern for what the ani-  tory a person has with an animal, trainers
             mal’s behaviour might be telling them. Like   should always approach an animal with care-
             humans, each animal has its own personal   ful observation of its body language, and only
             space and the data flows the moment the ani-  enter an animal’s personal space when the
             mal can perceive the trainer’s presence.  animal’s body language invites them in. If we
                                                      give animals control of our behaviour though
                                                      their body language we will gain trust,
             7.3.1  Personal Space
                                                      improve  personal  space  or  flight  distance,
             The concept of personal space was intro-  increase their comfort zone, and have more
             duced by Edward T. Hall in his book  The   productive training sessions.
             Hidden Dimension. He said, ‘Most people   Even when a trainer has established a high
             value their personal space and feel discom-  trust account with an animal, standing too
             fort, anger, or anxiety when their personal   close can be a problem that disrupts training
             space is encroached’ (Hall 1966). Personal   sessions. Some animals focus intently on a
             space is also considered ‘flight distance’ in   person’s hand, target, food container, etc.,
             animals and can be seen as the distance at   and stop paying attention to the other impor-
             which an animal shows comfortable body   tant aspects of the training environment.
             language as a person or other animal     There are times when we want an animal to
             approaches. Judith Bardwick, author  of   hold its nose or other body part against a tar-
             Danger  in the  Comfort  Zone, defines  the   get. However, there are also times when a tar-
             comfort zone as a behaviour state where a   get held too close to the mesh could cause an
             person operates in an anxiety‐neutral posi-  animal to try to bite or lick the target instead
             tion (Bardwick 1995). Flight distance and   of moving as indicated to the target.
             comfort zones are directly related to the rela-  Additionally, when an animal is ‘cross‐eyed’
             tionships we have with animals in our care   on a close target it may not see the rest of the
             and are strongly influenced by current condi-  environment including prompts and cues.
             tions. A lion  (Panthera leo) at Assiniboine   When you look cross‐eyed at something
             Zoo was new to training and just beginning   close to your face everything else goes out of
             to learn target training. As the keeper moved   focus. The same happens when trainers use
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158