Page 325 - Zoo Animal Learning and Training
P. 325

12.6  Does Predator Training Facilitate Survival  297

  VetBooks.ir  the prey species. Once these predators are     resembles  a  dangerous  predator  that  prey
                                                      are likely to encounter in the wild (e.g. din-
             known,  suitable  models,  or  live  predators
             (or substitutes), can be used as the conditioned
             stimulus for training. During training, mod-  goes in Australia, wolves in North America).
             els should be paired with a suitable aversive
             stimulus, and for example, the odour of the   12.6   Does Predator Training
             predator so the predator does not need to   Facilitate Survival Following
             be present. Odour is important because   Reintroduction to the Wild?
             many animals use both visual and olfactory
             cues to detect the presence of predators,   Many studies have successfully trained preda-
             and olfactory cues can enable prey to take   tor‐naive animals to recognise and respond to
             elusive action (e.g. hiding, entering a bur-  predators, but few studies have demonstrated
             row) in the presence of a hidden predator.   that pre‐release predator training enhances
             Models are advantageous because they pro-  the survival of animals following reintroduc-
             vide a standard conditioned stimulus and   tion to the wild (Ellis et al. 1977; Beck et al.
             there are few ethical problems with their   1988). To test whether predator training
             usage. Aversive stimuli can include firing   enhances survival, predator‐naive (the control
             rubber bands at the test subject, or simulat-  group) and predator‐trained individuals
             ing a frightening predation attempt by scar-  (experimental group) should be monitored
             ing or capturing the animal (Griffin et  al.     following release to the  wild using radio‐
             2000).  Using  models  avoids  the  potential   telemetry, or intensive mark‐and‐recapture
             problems associated with  the  use of  live   trapping techniques, to provide robust esti-
             predators, such as the spread of disease,   mates of survival (Lebreton et al. 1992). Ideally,
             injuries to prey, and variation in the uncon-  researchers should locate animals daily to
             ditioned stimulus.                       track their movements, and to identify the
               Although models are widely used to train   causes  of  mortality.  Previous  studies  have
             animals to avoid predators, they may lack   shown that most predation on animals occurs
             crucial chemical cues that animals use to   within weeks of release to the wild (Parish and
             identify  or  locate  predators;  for  example,   Sotherton 2007), so it is crucial to monitor ani-
             rodents show strong fear responses to the   mals daily during this period. Because many
             odour emanating from worn cat collars, yet   reintroduced animals often disperse away
             taxidermic mounts lack such chemicals    from reintroduction sites (Armstrong and
             (McGregor et  al. 2002). Hence, it may be   Seddon 2007), large sample sizes may be nec-
             necessary to add appropriate chemicals to   essary to provide robust estimates of survival.
             taxidermic mounts to train prey to associ-  Such studies are expensive, require good plan-
             ate the smell of predators with danger.   ning and organisation, and require a dedicated
             Predator urine and faeces may not be par-  team on the ground, and in the air, to track
             ticularly useful in this respect, since these   daily movements of  animals. Given that such
             odours  may  fail  to  elicit  antipredator   studies are expensive, and time consuming, it
             responses in wild animals (Apfelbach et al.   is not terribly surprising that few studies have
             2005). It would be far better to identify the   rigorously tested whether predator training pro-
             predator  chemicals  that  the  prey  respond   vides survival benefits following reintroduction.
             to, and pair these chemicals with suitable   Nonetheless, several research groups have
             models during predator training. Finally, in   not only trained animals to respond to pred-
             some circumstances, it may be more       ators, but have also monitored the fate of the
               appropriate to use a live predator, such as a   animals following release to the wild. Below,
               well‐trained domestic dog trained to chase,   I describe some of these projects in more
             but not catch animals (McLean et  al.    detail,  to  illustrate  the  logistical  difficulties
             2000),  particularly if that predator closely   involved with this sort of research.
   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330