Page 326 - The Welfare of Cattle
P. 326

daIrY CoW WeLfare and herd turnoVer rates                                   303


            portion of a dairy’s cash flow. In the US about 20% of the beef consumed by humans comes from
            dairy breeds.
               Producers recognize that premature removal of a cow from the herd is an economic liability
            and it has an emotional impact on most owners and employees. Retaining an animal in the milking
            herd when she is no longer delivering income over expenses also impacts owners and employees.
            Turnover is a normal part of dairying, and while very high turnover rates for health reasons may
            represent a management problem, so, too, do very low turnover.


                                              SUMMarY

               The studies presented in this chapter show dairy cattle welfare: In relation to herd size

              •  Had no association between herd size and production per cow
              •  Larger herds had better reproductive performance than smaller herds
              •  Mastitis prevalence was similar across all herd sizes
              •  Removals for injuries were higher in small herds and lower in large herds
              •  Live removals for feet and leg reasons were higher in larger herds
              •  There was no association found between herd size and survival by parity
              •  On-farm death rates increases slightly as herd size increases

            With respect to production per cow

              •  Feet and leg problems were not associated with higher production
              •  The lowest risk of removal was associated with cows producing more milk

            Other reported associations

              •  Feet and leg problems are a serious welfare issue especially for animals on concrete. Footbaths and
                 regular trimming help but more work needs to be done on flooring to address this issue
              •  Removals for feet and leg problems were twice as high in open vs. pregnant animals suggesting a
                 more complex issue exists than just lameness
              •  The lowest risks of removal were for pregnant cows
              •  Cows in and beyond lactation 5 are at a higher risk of on-farm death


                                          FINaL thOUGhtS

               As the concern about the welfare of dairy cattle grows, becomes more emotional, and more
            value laden, we all need to wrestle with how we foster production systems that meet the cow’s needs
            while also meeting the economic realities of the marketplace. To lower a cow’s risk of removal in
            today’s dairy she must outperform the average cow in the herd throughout her life. Does maintain-
            ing the cow’s health, safety and nutritional support allowing her to “win” that competition translate
            to good welfare? If not, what does?
               Longevity is a central theme expressed by those concerned with dairy cow welfare. Cows would
            remain in the dairy herd longer if milk prices were higher in relation to operational costs, and if the
            slaughter market remained higher for older animals. Without those two changes economic survival
            of the dairy enterprise necessitates higher turnover rates and shorter longevity.
               For a long time the emphasis on sire selection was skewed toward milk yield and component
            traits. Thankfully, sire selection now includes more robust and balanced criteria taking into account
            conformation and other longevity traits as important goals of a desirable breeding program. With
            changes in record keeping it’s possible we’ll understand more about why cattle leave the herd early
   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331