Page 111 - Flip Banks TG
P. 111
Although HSBC emerged from the financial crisis in a
relatively strong position, compared with many of its
competitors who had to resort to government bailouts, it
failed to capitalise on its position. For the seven years to
2018 strategic leadership had spent much of its time trying
to repair the damage from a series of previous scandals,
many of which were associated with the acquisitions not
made on their watch.
The question is one of how much did this fire fighting deflect
from achieving a clear strategic focus?
For Gulliver, who inherited a company which prior to his
stewardship, pursued a strategy of growth by acquisition,
the environment was radically different. Legislation placed
greater onus on separating retail and investment businesses
with a stronger need for fiduciary compliance. Acquisition
had become a less attractive option rather efficiency and
effectiveness, which had been lacking in the structure and
processes of the organisation prior to Gulliver was called
for.
Growth was in the far east where historically HSBC was
strong. Its dilemma was that two thirds of its capital was in
the U.S. and Europe where interest rates were low with the
inevitable detrimental impact on earnings and returns.
Gulliver’s response to the crises confronting HSBC post 2008
was to put the bank back into a strong business and capital
position delivering earnings growth by restructuring the
bank, selling more than 100 businesses in underperforming
markets such as Brazil, while switching from highly