Page 15 - How Not To Cook The Books Article
P. 15

The creditors report said:

                              "It has been confirmed that the valuation relied upon in the
                              year ending 31st December 2007 statutory accounts of

                              Wrekin Construction Co Ltd (WCC), purportedly issued by
                              the Instituto Gemmologico Italiano is a forged document.”

                              "The source of the forgery is not known. The gem had been
                              included as an £11m current asset in WCC's balance sheet."

               It added:

                               "At this time it is not possible to place a value on the uncut

                              stone." (9)

               Unwin claimed he had been the victim of a third party valuation fraud. He
               said: "I believed it [the stone] to be worth a lot more when I bought it."

               The investigations by the Insolvency Service also found that in the
               weeks before the gem was transferred to Wrekin, Unwin acknowledged

               in a meeting with the company’s former auditors there were uncertainties
               about the gem’s value. It also said Mr Ibbotson, Wrekin Construction’s
               finance director, was aware of those uncertainties, but told the
               company’s new auditors that £11m was a genuine market value.

               2007, Tamar switched its auditors from the Big Four practice, KPMG to
               Ashgates Corporate Services, a small Derby based accountancy group

               after Tamar bought Wrekin. Ashgates accepted the gem’s value of £11
               million.

               Insolvency Service spokesman Pabitar Powar said:

                              "The purchase of an uncut ruby gemstone by Wrekin
                              (Construction) was extraordinary and questionable.”

                              "It is clear that the gemstone was included in the accounts to

                              portray Wrekin's financial position as a sound one, whereas
                              its true position was the exact opposite." (9)

               Unwin was also found to have made sham payments of £768,177 and
               £516,959 from Wrekin to two other companies controlled by him
               Britannia Management Services and Equatrek (UK) whilst knowing that
               the construction firm was under severe financial pressure and unable to

               pay its debts.
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20