Page 7 - GP Spring 2024

Figure 4. Initial intraoral and facial profile photographs of a 12-year-old male patient with a
class II division 1 skeletal and dental malocclusion.
Figure 2. Initial intraoral and facial profile photographs of a 12-year-old male patient with a
class II division 1 skeletal and dental malocclusion.
References:
1. Munoz AM, Maino G, Lemler J, Kornbluth D.
Skeletal Anchorage for Class II Correction in a
Growing Patient. Journal of Clinical Orthodon-
tics 2009;43(5):325-31.
2. Gianelly, A.A.; Bednar, J.B.; Cociani, S.;
Giancotti, F.; Maino, G.; and Richter, O.: Bidi-
mensional Technique Theory and Practice, GAC
International, Central Islip, NY, 2000.
3. Keeling SD, King GJ, Wheeler TT, McCorrey
S. Timing of class II treatment. Rational, meth-
ods and early results of an ongoing randomized
clinical trial, in Orthodontic Treatment: Outcome
and Effectiveness in Craniofacial Growth Series
Figure 2. Initial intraoral and facial profile photographs of a 12-year-old male patient with a
Vol 30 eds Trotman C, McNamara JA Jr. Cen-
class II division 1 skeletal and dental malocclusion. ter for Human Growth and Development, Univ.
Michigan. Ann Arbor 1995 pp 81-112.
4. Armstrong NM. Controlling the magnitude,
duration, and direction of extra oral force. Am J

Orthod 1971: 59:217-43.
5. Kirjavainen, M.; Kirjavainen, T.; and Haavik-
Figure 3. Final intraoral and facial profile photographs of a 14-year-old male patient with a class
ko, K.: Changes in dental arch dimensions by
II division 1 skeletal and dental malocclusion. use of an orthopedic cervical headgear in Class
II correction, Am. J. Orthod 1997;111:59-66.
6. Little, R.M.; Wallen, T.R.; and Reidel, R.A.:
Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior
alignment—First premolar extraction cases
Figure 5. Final intraoral and facial profile photographs of a 14-year-old male patient with a class
treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics,
II division 1 skeletal and dental malocclusion.
Am. J. Orthod 1981:80:349-65.
7. Papageorgiou SN, Kutschera E, Memmert
S, Gölz L, Jäger A, Bourauel C, Eliades T. Effec-
tiveness of early orthopedic treatment with head-
About the Author: gear: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur
Dr. AnaMaria Munoz is a Diplomate, American Board of Orthodontics and is a Clinical Assistant
J Orthod 2017; 39: 176–87.
8. Casas Estivales X. Motivacion y cooperacion
Professor in the Department of Orthodontics at New York University College of Dentistry.
en la higiene dental durante el tratamiento de
ortodoncia. Ortodoncia espanola 1987,Vol 28
Number 1.
Figure 3. Final intraoral and facial profile 9. Leung MTC, Lee TCK, Rabie ABM,
photographs of a 14-year-old male patient References: Wong RWK. Use of miniscrews and miniplates
Figure 3. Final intraoral and facial profile photographs of a 14-year-old male patient with a class
in orthodontics. JOMS 2008; 66:1461-66.
with a class II division 1 skeletal and dental 10. Bass, N.M.: The aesthetic analysis of the
II division 1 skeletal and dental malocclusion.
malocclusion. 1. Munoz AM, Maino G, Lemler J, Kornbluth D. Skeletal Anchorage for Class II Correction in
face. Eur. J. Orthod. 1991; 13:343-50.
a Growing Patient. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 2009;43(5):325-31.
11. Gianelly, A.A. and Dietz, V.S.: Maxillary
arch considerations in diagnosis and treatment
planning, J. Clin. Orthod. 1982 16:168-72.
Dr. AnaMaria Munoz is
a Diplomate, American
Figure 5. Final intraoral and facial profile Board of Orthodontics
photographs of a 14-year-old male patient and is a Clinical Assistant
with a class II division 1 skeletal and dental Professor in the Depart-
malocclusion. ment of Orthodontics at
New York University Col-
lege of Dentistry.

Figure 4. Initial intraoral and facial profile photographs of a 12-year-old male patient with a class II division 1
skeletal and dental malocclusion.
www.nysagd.org l Spring 2024 l GP 7