Page 53 - FINAL Combined CB2_Neat
P. 53

Business Development and Project Financial Performance
              As indicated above, the number of project opportunities decreased again last year. On average
              over the past five years, we have pursued about 1/3 of the total opportunities we identify, and FY
              2017 fit into this pattern. A summary of some metrics for the past six years is provided below:

               Category                                FY       FY      FY       FY      FY       FY
                                                      2012    2013     2014     2015    2016     2017
               Total Opportunities (Proposals + No     91      81       60       66      40       30
               Go’s)

               Proposals Submitted
                   -  Studies/Retainer Contracts       7        4        8       5        6        3
                   -  Full Projects                    20      17       17       26       7        7
                   -  Total                            27      21       25       31      13       10

               Construction Values of Projects
               Pursued
                   -  Total                          $418M  $421M  $249M  $214M         $62M     $53M
                   -  Average                        $21M     $25M     $10M     $9M      $9M    $7.5M

               Hit Rate
                   -  Proposal to Shortlist/Interview  10/27   6/21    11/25   11/31    4/13      1/8
                                                     (37%)    (29%)    (44%)   (35%)    (31%)    (13%)
                   -  Shortlist/Interview to Win      7/10     2/6     3/11     4/11     1/3*     1/1
                                                     (70%)    (33%)    (27%)   (36%)    (33%)   (100%)
                   -  Pending                                                                      2



              The following chart tracks our performance in regard to the Sales and Net Revenue goals and the
              Marketing budget which we had set at the beginning of FY 2017. Our sales for the year were anemic,
              and were due almost entirely to several small commissions at Northwestern University. We finished
              slightly under budget in regard to Marketing Costs. If the TDL project had resumed in FY 2017 as
              anticipated,  our  net  revenue  target  would  likely  have  been  realized.  We  entered  FY2018  with  a
              backlog of work valued at approximately $815,000 in net revenue.


               Sales/Revenue/Marketing Costs Summary (FY 2017)
               Category                        Target                  Actual             Percent of Target

               Sales
               Gross Fees                          $3,954,489               $162,650            4%
               Net Fees                            $1,626,187               $150,250            9%
               Revenue
               Net                                 $1,571,742              $1,107,189           70%
               Profit ($)                           $157,174                $222,723           146%
               Profit (%)                                10%                     20%
               Marketing Costs
               Labor (Hours)                            3,200                   2,367           74%
               Labor ($)                            $136,500                $140,564           103%
               Out-of-pocket expenses                 $37,515                 $27,540           73%
               Total Marketing Cost                 $174,015                $168,104            97%

              The  graph  below  reflects  efforts  to  adjust  our  marketing  costs  with  expectations  regarding  the
              number and value of opportunities we anticipate through the year. As a general rule of thumb in
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58