Page 55 - C:\Users\hp\Documents\Flip PDF Professional\2020 research project final report\
P. 55

Referring to another result, we could also see that 61 percent of respondents

               acknowledged  that  the  boycott  is  a  reasonable  yet  necessary  event,  and  their

               reasons  to  this  were  all  similar  -  looking  back  from  the  historical  records  on

               Japanese colonization in Korea, it is reasonable to held such events to stop Korea

               and our people to be treated incongruously. The 6 percent who said no had shown

               unspecified reasons, and the rest who stayed neutral were those who were not sure

               of  the  events.  Through  the  results,  we  referred  that  most  of  the  people  were

               considering the boycott necessary in hope to alter Japan’s objectionable behavior.

                        The last result where we asked whether the respondents of the survey were

               taking part in the boycott themselves, most of them seemed to try their best while

               20 percent of them said no. 20 percent is not a small number. This shows that

               although many people are considering boycotting the best solution to alter the

               situation of being mistreated, there are still some desires to purchase products of

               their possessions, and this cannot be forced.

                       Also, to simply summarize the postwar situation of the boycott, Japan needed

               to compensate the victims of the past but Japan tried to avoid and started to

               restrict  the  sharing  of  products  in  Korea.  The  relationship  of  the  two  countries

               started to be at stake, and the conflicts led to Korea citizens boycotting on Japanese

               goods. This action as mentioned before, it was a citizen movement, not obliged by

               the government. However, as the movement got larger, it grew up to affect the

               political landscape of Korea. Also, if we relate to the events that followed after the

               boycott,  we  can  see  that  the  GSOMIA  contract  was  revoked,  and  Korea  was

               removed from the white list of Japan. These two main events pinpoint the political

               impacts in Korea’s political landscape due to the boycott.



               5. CONCLUSION

                     The  two contracts  - GSOMIA and Japan’s white list  - played the role as a

               promise between the two countries to sustain their rapprochement, and Japan’s




                                                                                                       54
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60