Page 55 - C:\Users\hp\Documents\Flip PDF Professional\2020 research project final report\
P. 55
Referring to another result, we could also see that 61 percent of respondents
acknowledged that the boycott is a reasonable yet necessary event, and their
reasons to this were all similar - looking back from the historical records on
Japanese colonization in Korea, it is reasonable to held such events to stop Korea
and our people to be treated incongruously. The 6 percent who said no had shown
unspecified reasons, and the rest who stayed neutral were those who were not sure
of the events. Through the results, we referred that most of the people were
considering the boycott necessary in hope to alter Japan’s objectionable behavior.
The last result where we asked whether the respondents of the survey were
taking part in the boycott themselves, most of them seemed to try their best while
20 percent of them said no. 20 percent is not a small number. This shows that
although many people are considering boycotting the best solution to alter the
situation of being mistreated, there are still some desires to purchase products of
their possessions, and this cannot be forced.
Also, to simply summarize the postwar situation of the boycott, Japan needed
to compensate the victims of the past but Japan tried to avoid and started to
restrict the sharing of products in Korea. The relationship of the two countries
started to be at stake, and the conflicts led to Korea citizens boycotting on Japanese
goods. This action as mentioned before, it was a citizen movement, not obliged by
the government. However, as the movement got larger, it grew up to affect the
political landscape of Korea. Also, if we relate to the events that followed after the
boycott, we can see that the GSOMIA contract was revoked, and Korea was
removed from the white list of Japan. These two main events pinpoint the political
impacts in Korea’s political landscape due to the boycott.
5. CONCLUSION
The two contracts - GSOMIA and Japan’s white list - played the role as a
promise between the two countries to sustain their rapprochement, and Japan’s
54