Page 180 - Trans-Num-V1

CHAPITRE VII L’apport du numérique en implantologie

19. Shen P., Zhao J., Fan L., et al. (2015). Accuracy evaluation of computer-designed surgical-guide template
in oral implantology. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43, pp. 2189-2194.
20. Hämmerle C.H., Cordaro L., Van Assche N., et al. (2015). Digital technologies to support planning, treat-
ment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015.
Clin Oral Implants Res 26(suppl 11), pp. 97-101.

21. Park M.E. & Shin S.Y. (2018). Three-dimensional comparative study on the accuracy and reproducibility
of dental casts fabricated by 3D printers. J Prosthet Dent 119, pp. 861.e1-861.e7.
22. Rebong R.E., Stewart K.T., Ultra A. & Ghnneima A.A. (2018). Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin
models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: a
comparative study. Angle orthod 88, pp. 363-369.
23. Vercruyssen M., Cox C., Coucke W., Naert I., Jacobs R. & Quirynen M. (2104). A randomized clinical trial
comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a
pilot-drill template. J Clin Periodontal 41(7), pp. 717-727.
24. Vercruyssen M., De Laat A., Coucke W. & Quirynen M. (2014). An RCT comparing patient-centered
outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement.
J Clin Periodontal 23, pp. 447-732.

25. Van Assche N. & Quirynen M. (2010 avril). Tolerance withnqn a surgical guide. Clin Oral Implants Res
21(4), pp. 455-458
26. Koop R., Vercruyssen M., Vermeulen K. & Quirynen M. (2013, juin). Tolerance within the Sleeve inserts
of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(6), pp. 630-4.
27. Zhou W., Liu Z., Song L., Kuo C.L. & Shafer D.M. (2018). Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided
implant surgery-A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract 18(1), pp. 28-40.
28. Dada K., Pariente L. & Daas M. Strategic extraction protocol: Use of an image-fusion stereolithographic
guide for immediate implant placement. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 116(5), pp. 652-656.
29. Van Assche N., Van Steenberghe D., Quirynen M. & Jacobs R. (2010) Accuracy assessment of compu-
ter assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism. J clinic Periodontal, pp. 398-403.

30. Fortin T., Bosson J.L., Isidori M. & Blanchet E. (2006). Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in
implant placement using an image-guided system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21, pp. 298-304.
31. Block M.S., Emery R.W., Cullum D.R. & SheikhImplant A. (2017). Placement is more accurate using
dynamic navigation. J Oral Maxillofac Sur 75, pp. 751377-1386.
32. Block M.S., Emery R.W., Lank K. & Ryan J. (2017, janvier). Implant Placement accuracy using dynamic
navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 32(1), pp. 92-99.
33. Plaud A. (2015). Elaboration d’un substitut osseux sur mesure par prototypage rapide. These pour l’ob-
tention du diplôme d’état en chirurgie dentaire. Université de Bordeaux, College des sciences de la
santé, UFR des sciences odontologiques, Bordeaux.
34. Cohen A., Laviv A., Berman P., Nashef R. & Abu-Tair J. (2009). Mandibular reconstruction using stereo-
litographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
Endod 108, pp. 661-666.
35. Seiler M., Peetz M., Hartmann A. & Witkowski R. (2018). Individualized CAD/CAM-produced titanium
scaffold for alveolar bone augmentation : a retrospective analysis of dehiscence events in relation to
demographic and surgical parameters. J Oral Science Rehabilitation 4, pp. 38-46.

180

18/03/2021 17:48
Trans_Num.indd 180
Trans_Num.indd 180 18/03/2021 17:48