Page 75 - Financial Statement Analysis
P. 75

sub79433_ch01.qxd  4/7/08  11:21 AM  Page 52






                  52                 Financial Statement Analysis



                  EXERCISE 1–15      On January 1, Year 1, you are considering the purchase of Nico Enterprises’ common stock. Based
                  Residual Income    on your analysis of Nico Enterprises, you determine the following:
                  Equity Valuation
                                     1. Book value at January 1, Year 1, is $50 per share.
                                     2. Predicted net income per share for Year 1 through Year 5 is $8, $11, $20, $40, and $30, respectively.
                                     3. For Year 6 and continuing for all years after, predicted residual income is $0.
                                     4. Nico is not expected to pay dividends.
                                     5. Required rate of return (cost of capital) is 20%.
                                     Required:
                                     Determine the purchase price per share of Nico Enterprises’ common stock as of January 1,
                                     Year 1, using the residual income valuation model (round your answer to the nearest cent).
                                     Comment on the strengths and limitations of this model for investment decisions.




                   PROBLEMS

                  PROBLEM 1–1        Kampa Company and Arbor Company are similar firms that operate in the same industry. Arbor
                  Analyzing Efficiency  began operations in 2001 and Kampa in 1995. In 2006, both companies pay 7% interest on their
                  and Financial Leverage  debt to creditors. The following additional information is available:

                                                              KAMPA COMPANY                ARBOR COMPANY
                                                         2006     2005      2004     2006      2005     2004
                                     Total asset turnover  . . . . . .  3.0  2.7  2.9  1.6     1.4      1.1
                                     Return on total assets  . . . .  8.9%  9.5%  8.7%  5.8%   5.5%     5.2%
                                     Profit margin  . . . . . . . . . . .  2.3%  2.4%  2.2%  2.7%  2.9%  2.8%
                                     Sales  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $400,000  $370,000  $386,000  $200,000  $160,000  $100,000


                                     Write a one-half page report comparing Kampa and Arbor using the available information. Your
                                     discussion should include their ability to use assets efficiently to produce profits. Also comment
                                     on their success in employing financial leverage in 2006.




                  PROBLEM 1–2        Selected comparative financial statements of Cohorn Company follow:
                  Calculation and Analysis
                  of Trend Percents                           COHORN COMPANY
                                                          Comparative Income Statement ($000)
                                                           For Years Ended December 31, 2000–2006
                                                        2006    2005    2004    2003     2002    2001    2000
                                      Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,594  $1,396  $1,270  $1,164  $1,086  $1,010  $828
                                      Cost of goods sold  . . . . .  1,146  932  802  702  652    610    486
                                      Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . .  448  464  468  462  434  400   342
                                      Operating expenses  . . . .  340  266  244  180     156     154    128
                                      Net income  . . . . . . . . . . . $ 108  $ 198  $ 224  $ 282  $ 278  $ 246  $214
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80