Page 161 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 161

Primary groups



                       Primary groups are characterized by relatively small, long-lasting groups of individuals

               who share personally meaningful relationships. Since these groups often interact face-to-face, they

               know each other very well and are unified. Individuals that are a part of primary groups consider


               the group to be an important part of their lives. Consequently, members strongly identify with their

               group,  even  without  regular  meetings  (Forsyth,  2006).  Cooley (Forsyth,  2006) believed  that


               primary groups were essential for integrating individuals into their society since this is often their

               first experience with a group. For example, individuals are born into a primary group, their family,


               which creates a foundation for them to base their future relationships. Individuals can be born into

               a primary group; however, primary groups can also form when individuals interact for extended

               periods of time in meaningful ways (Forsyth, 2006). Examples of primary groups include family,


               close friends, and gangs.


               Collectives



                       Collectives are characterized by large groups of individuals who display similar actions or

               outlooks.  They  are  loosely  formed,  spontaneous,  and  brief  (Forsyth,  2006).  Examples  of


               collectives include a flash mob, an audience at a movie, and a crowd watching a building burn.


               Categories



                       Categories are characterized by a collection of individuals who are similar in some way

               (Forsyth, 2006) . Categories become groups when their similarities have social implications. For


               example, when people treat others differently because of their race, this creates groups of different

               races  (Forsyth,  2006).  For  this  reason,  categories  can  appear  to  be  higher  in  entitativity  and

               essentialism  than  primary,  social,  and  collective  groups.  Entitativity  is  defined  by  Campbell



                                                             142
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166