Page 162 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 162

(Campbell, 1958) as the extent to which collections of individuals are perceived to be a group. The

               degree  of  entitativity  that  a  group  has  is  influenced  by  whether  a  collection  of  individuals


               experience the same fate, display similarities, and are close in proximity. If individuals believe

               that a group is high in entitativity, then they are likely to believe that the group has unchanging


               characteristics that are essential to the group, known as essentialism (Haslam, Rothschild, & Ernst,

               2002). Examples of categories are New Yorkers, gamblers, and women.



               Group Membership and Social Identity


                       The  social  group  is  a  critical  source  of  information  about  individual  identity.  (Crano,


               2000) An individual’s identity (or self-concept) has two components: personal identity and social

               identity (or collective self). One’s personal identity is defined by more idiosyncratic, individual


               qualities and attributes. (Hogg & Williams, 2000) In contrast, one’s social identity is defined by

               his or her group membership, and the general characteristics (or prototypes) that define the group


               and differentiate it from others. (Hogg & Williams, 2000)We naturally make comparisons between

               our own group and other groups, but we do not necessarily make objective comparisons. Instead,

               we make evaluations that are self-enhancing, emphasizing the positive qualities of our own group



               (see ingroup bias). (Hogg & Williams, 2000) In this way, these comparisons give us a distinct and
               valued social identity that benefits our self-esteem. Our social identity and group membership also


               satisfies a need to belong. (Spears, Ellemers, & Doosje, 2005) Of course, individuals belong to

               multiple groups. Therefore, one’s social identity can have several, qualitatively distinct parts (for


               example, one’s ethnic identity, religious identity, and political identity). (Deaux, Reid, Mizrahi, &

               Ethier, 1995)


                       Optimal  distinctiveness  theory suggests  that  individuals  have  a  desire  to  be  similar  to


               others, but also a desire to differentiate themselves, ultimately seeking some balance of these two

                                                             143
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167