Page 364 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 364

where the CC events were being held was a concern, but not enough of an issue to keep her from

               attending the two last dialogues. A second White female participant expressed apprehension about


               attending her first dialogue. Her expressed concern was that she would not know any of the other

               attendees and perhaps be the only White person in the group. Both examples describe feelings of


               apprehension and tension felt prior to the dialogue sessions. Note that the conveners considered

               several venues for the Community Conversations and chose centrally located sites to allow for a


               high degree of accessibility by individuals using multiple modes of transportation. One White

               respondent indicated one particular venue, the Jewish Community Center, stood out as a safe place


               that one could enter without concern that someone would question why she was there. While

               interview volunteers noted visibility of entry and access points as a potential security concern with


               its ease of access, it did not prevent anyone interviewed from attending the last dialogue sessions.


                       Overall, the composition of the dialogue groups was predominantly African-American and


               predominantly female. The dialogue tables provided intimate settings in which women comprised

               the participant majority, although men and whites were also in attendance for each dialogue too.


                       Table  5.1  below  (next  page)  includes  the  total  number  of  interviews  (participants  and


               facilitators)  who  participated  in  my  research  (and  follow-up)  for  the  entire  4  Community

               Conversation series.  Although number of participants surveyed varied at each event I was able to


               a representative sample and follow-up interviews at each one.  Facilitators at the second meeting

               (perhaps because it was the real first dialogue) seemed excited to see a Community Conversation


               study being done and in awaiting instruction on starting the dialogue handed out my survey to the

               participants as I walked around to each table.  In all about 60% returned fully competed surveys.








                                                             345
   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369