Page 361 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 361
interactions they can confront the difficult task of understanding implicit bias and race related
issues with each other in authentic and more meaningful ways through experiences that are
constructivist in nature. The emergent theoretical propositions were developed in an Metasphere
crafted and sustained through its co-creation and containment of safety felt and shared by
participants and facilitators; the resulting core dimension from the dimensional analysis comes
from within these dialogues.
Each proposition is representative of the synergy created within the dialogue group with
the help of experienced and trusted facilitators, in an environment where participants felt safe
enough to risk, share, confront and reflect in a way that prompted varying degrees of reflection,
shifts and transformation. The propositions that emerged from the data and subsequent analysis
include creating space to move from tension to healing; heart stories, hurt stories (hearing and
understanding differently), sustaining conversation, bridging divides to next actions. Each element
describes the aware experiences and contributing conditions of the civic and deliberative dialogue
process for exploring the difficult and controversial topics of race and racism. Together, the four
theoretical propositions knit a symbolic interactionist view of the power of civic and deliberative
dialogue as a Community Conversation that adds value to the practice of bridging racial divide.
The ordering of the propositions is important to the discussion and relates to a process of
progression that allows for the occurrence of movement by dialogue participants. Below, each
proposition is discussed in relation to the literature, how the four are interconnected, and why
Community Conversations that foster these four connections contributes to individual and
collective consciousness raising through leader-as-exemplified brings opportunities for change.
342