Page 410 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
        P. 410
     The  theory  explains  how  individuals  evaluate  their  own  opinions  and  abilities  by
               comparing themselves to others in order to reduce uncertainty in these domains and learn how to
               define the self.  Following the initial theory, research began to focus on social comparison as a
               way of self-enhancement, that once become introduced evoke the concepts of community service,
               giving back and expanding personal motivations of social engagement towards causes and serving
               the greater good.
               Communities in Conversation and Relational Leadership
                       The  dialogues  on  race  also  displayed  leader-as-exemplified  qualities  using  practices
               derived from relation leadership principles and the belief that leadership is derived from everyday
               dialogical  practices  and  the  belief  that  “we  exist  in  mutual  relationship  with  others  and  our
               surroundings and as such, we both shape and are shaped through these encounters” (Cunliffe &
               Eriksen,  2011).  I  believe  the  conveners  and  facilitators  of  the  Albany  NY  Community
               Conversation dialogues on Implicit Bias intuitively understood the link between dialogism and the
               polyphony that emerges from civic and participatory dialogue practice.
                       Dialogism emphasizes the realizations that conversations are organic, and live on after the
               many voices of a fluid, emergent natured (polyphonic) dialogue conversation stops (Cunliffe &
               Eriksen, 2011). Through the dialogue, African American, Multiracial and White resident’s ideas
               were shared, new meanings were constructed about race from local lens and a historical context.
                       Civic  dialogue  focuses  on  the  strength  of  the  collective,  which  supersedes  individual
               interests.  As  such,  the  dialogue  group  facilitators  assisted  participants  in  creating  a  dialogue
               environment that emphasized a dual individual and collective well-being through the interactions
               and conversations of group members interacting in collaboration with facilitator guidance and
                                                             391





