Page 406 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
        P. 406
     and empowerment. Civic dialogue convened in-person requires high levels of commitment and
               personal stake (Jenlink, 2008; Yankelovich, 1991) that are critical for bridging the racial divide
                                                       1
               and in mending entrenched and “wicked”  (Matthews, 2004; Rittel & Webber, 1973;) issues.
                       Similar  to  distributive  leadership  and  perhaps  more  appropriate  to  the  civic  dialogue
               exchanges that challenged long-held beliefs and perspectives by the participants, is the concept
               leaderfulness (Raelin, 2011).
               Community Conversations: Civic Engagement, Group Dialogue & Leadership-Exemplified
                       The focus of leaderful practice is concerned with what groups of people can accomplish
               together rather than singularly and this sets forth a model that can exemplify excellence. While
               Raelin’s (2011, 2008, 2004) scholarship on the concept of leaderfulness is centered primarily in
               management  and  organizational  settings,  the  attributes  of  leaderfulness,  as  a  specific  form  of
               distributive  leadership  are  relevant  to  the  practice  of  civic  and  participatory  dialogue  and  the
               actions successfully used to confront tension and disagreement during the Albany dialogues that
               arose out of the groups consideration of implicit bias, race, racism and discrimination impacts.
                       The  concept  of  leadership-exemplified  is  a  more  accurate  description  of  the  civic
               engagement and frameworks emphasizing participatory democracy (Fishkin, 2009; Gutmann &
               Thompson, 2004) because it reflects an approach to leadership that is “collective, concurrent, and
               collaborative” (Raelin, 2004, p. 1) process and in many respects corresponds to behaviors and
               conditions  present  during  high  stakes  dialogues.  Each  Community  Conversation  group  was  a
               collective of diverse and unrelated individuals consisting of laborers, retirees, educators, students
               1  Rittel and Webber (1973) defined “wicked” social policy issues in the context of urban planning theory as a
               problem having an unclear diagnosis and definition, and an uncertain cause. The resolution of these issue calls for
               defining and identifying the gap between what out to be versus what is.
                                                             387





