Page 406 - Mike Ratner CC - WISR Complete Dissertation - v6
P. 406

and empowerment. Civic dialogue convened in-person requires high levels of commitment and

               personal stake (Jenlink, 2008; Yankelovich, 1991) that are critical for bridging the racial divide


                                                       1
               and in mending entrenched and “wicked”  (Matthews, 2004; Rittel & Webber, 1973;) issues.

                       Similar  to  distributive  leadership  and  perhaps  more  appropriate  to  the  civic  dialogue


               exchanges that challenged long-held beliefs and perspectives by the participants, is the concept

               leaderfulness (Raelin, 2011).



               Community Conversations: Civic Engagement, Group Dialogue & Leadership-Exemplified


                       The focus of leaderful practice is concerned with what groups of people can accomplish


               together rather than singularly and this sets forth a model that can exemplify excellence. While

               Raelin’s (2011, 2008, 2004) scholarship on the concept of leaderfulness is centered primarily in


               management  and  organizational  settings,  the  attributes  of  leaderfulness,  as  a  specific  form  of

               distributive  leadership  are  relevant  to  the  practice  of  civic  and  participatory  dialogue  and  the


               actions successfully used to confront tension and disagreement during the Albany dialogues that

               arose out of the groups consideration of implicit bias, race, racism and discrimination impacts.


                       The  concept  of  leadership-exemplified  is  a  more  accurate  description  of  the  civic


               engagement and frameworks emphasizing participatory democracy (Fishkin, 2009; Gutmann &

               Thompson, 2004) because it reflects an approach to leadership that is “collective, concurrent, and


               collaborative” (Raelin, 2004, p. 1) process and in many respects corresponds to behaviors and

               conditions  present  during  high  stakes  dialogues.  Each  Community  Conversation  group  was  a


               collective of diverse and unrelated individuals consisting of laborers, retirees, educators, students




               1  Rittel and Webber (1973) defined “wicked” social policy issues in the context of urban planning theory as a
               problem having an unclear diagnosis and definition, and an uncertain cause. The resolution of these issue calls for
               defining and identifying the gap between what out to be versus what is.
                                                             387
   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411