Page 66 - The 'X' Chronicles Newspaper - February 2023 Edition
P. 66

66             Why Canada Didn’t Shoot China Balloon





         When a suspected Chinese


             spy balloon flew over
            Canada, why didn't we


                   shoot it down?



        Questions have been raised about
         why Canada didn’t act when the

             balloon was in our airspace


        Amid all the suspicion and intrigue that's
        been swirling around the Chinese spy
        balloon are questions related specifically
        to the time it was flying in Canadian

        airspace.


        The balloon was first sighted Jan. 28 as it
        flew over  Alaska, according to U.S.
        Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin, and it
        flew over the Yukon and B.C.'s Interior
        before returning to  American airspace
        over Montana.                                    of the Canadian government, and the country was an opportunity to watch it
                                                         NORAD agreement makes NORAD an and gather our own intelligence about

        Some Canadians — including opposition            executor of that decision making.                how it was doing — and what it was
        party members and CBC readers — have                                                              doing," Clancy said.
        questioned why this country didn't act           So in this case, Clancy says as soon as the
        sooner, why we didn't shoot it down              balloon was identified over  Alaska, NORAD                      commander           VanHerck
        ourselves, and whether Canada's military         Canada would have been informed by the confirmed the move was strategic in the
        was even capable of doing so.                    commander of NORAD, who would same Monday briefing.
                                                         inform "the hierarchies — political and
        Should Canada have acted when                    military — of both governments in the "This gave us the opportunity to assess
                                                         United        States       and        Canada what they were actually doing, what kind
        it flew into Canadian airspace?
                                                         simultaneously."                                 of capabilities existed on the balloon,
                                                                                                          what kind of transmission capabilities
        The short answer, according to military
                                                         And the decision as to how to react, he existed," he said.
        experts, is no.
                                                         said, would be a "balance between
                                                         intelligence and operational security and VanHerck did not elaborate on what they
        "To say that, oh, Canada should have shot
                                                         public safety."                                  were able to learn, but Clancy says it
        this balloon down on its own — that's just
                                                                                                          could have included insight into their
        silly," said University of Calgary history
                                                         NORAD commander U.S. Gen. Glen uses of technology.
        professor and military historian David
                                                         VanHerck said there was some action
        Bercuson.
                                                         taken when the balloon was over Canada.  "It would be very interesting to know the
                                                                                                          kind of emission devices that were
        "That just completely ignores the fact that
                                                         "There was some speculation about a sending information back to China from
        NORAD exists that we're part of it and
                                                         second one," he told reporters during a this balloon," Clancy said. "I think that's
        have been part of it for almost 80 years
                                                         briefing Monday. "I launched NORAD going to be very indicative of some
        now."
                                                         fighters, Canadian CF-18s, and we were things."
                                                         not able to corroborate any additional
        NORAD is the North  American
                                                         balloon."                                        And, said Clancy, allowing the balloon to
        Aerospace         Defense         Command,
                                                                                                          continue to drift helped keep China a bit
        responsible for aerospace warning,
                                                         Why was the balloon allowed to fly in in the dark.
        aerospace control, and maritime warning.
                                                         North American airspace for as long as it
                                                         did?                                             "In the early days, the predominant factor
        Retired major general Scott Clancy, who
                                                                                                          at play was trying to allow this to play out
        at one point served as deputy commander
                                                         Both Clancy, the retired NORAD deputy so that the Chinese did not know whether
        of the  Alaskan NORAD Region, says
                                                         commander, and Bercuson say that once or not NORAD knew of — NORAD
        while each country has sovereignty over
                                                         the balloon was deemed not to pose any being the United States and Canada —
        its airspaces, "the binational command of
                                                         tactical threat to people on the ground, it knew of the presence of this balloon in
        NORAD is both Canada and the United
                                                         actually offered up an opportunity for Canadian and U.S. airspace," he said.
        States. It's not one or the other."
                                                         Canadians and  Americans to gather
                                                         important information.                                              (Continued on Page 67)
        He said any decision to act within
        Canadian airspace would be the purview
                                                         "Just having the balloon move across the
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71