Page 22 - DTPA Journal December 21
P. 22

e         Journal
                                                                             eJournal








                                                                                           Nov. - Dec., 2021


                 and hence, no capital gain would arise thereon; further,   SECTION 9 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 -
                 when  consideration  is  indeterminate,  computation   INCOME - DEEMED TO ACCRUE OR ARISE IN
                 provisions  of  section  56(2)(viia)  to  determine   INDIA
                 inadequacy or otherwise of 'such consideration' also fail
                 and provisions of section 56(2)(viia) could not be made   Bengal  Tiger  Line  (P.)  Ltd.  v.  Deputy
                 applicable to capital contribution of a partner made in   Commissioner  of  Income  Tax  (International
                 firm .                                             Taxation) 1(1), Chennai - [2020] 121 taxmann.com
                                                                    165 (Chennai - Trib.)
                 UDDHAV KRISHNA BANKAR VS INCOME TAX                In terms of Article 8 of India Singapore DTAA, global
                 OFFICER : (2020) 60 CCH 0224 PuneTrib              income of a tax resident of Singapore from shipping
                 The  requirement  of  depositing  before  the  date  of   operations,  even  though  which  is  earned  outside
                 furnishing of return of Income under Section 139 of the   Singapore is taxable only in Singapore on accrual basis
                 Act has not to be restricted only to the date specified in   and consequently article 24 of India Singapore DTAA
                 Section 139(1) of the Act but would include all sub   cannot be invoked to deny benefit of exemption merely
                 section of Section 139 including sub section (4) of the   for simple reason that said income was not taxed in
                 Act.                                               Singapore by virtue of separate exemptions provided
                                                                    under Singapore Income-tax Act.
                 SECTION 132 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 -
                 SEARCH AND SEIZURE                                 Intel Technology India (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of
                                                                    Income Tax,  International Taxation,  Bangalore  -
                 Best Oasis Ltd. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax   [2020] 121 taxmann.com 130 (SC)
                 ADIT (Investigation) - [2020] 121 taxmann.com 32   Royalties/Fees  For  technical  services  -  General  :
                 (Gujarat)                                          Where  High  Court  had  not  answered  question  of
                 Attachment  v/s  132(9B)  :  Where  revenue  had   payment  of  royalty  on  merits,  matter  should  be
                 provisionally  attached  fixed  deposit  receipts  of  two   restored to High Court
                 bank accounts of assessee, assessee's prayer to operate   Symantec  Asia  Pacific  Pte.  Ltd.  v.  Deputy
                 said bank accounts was to be allowed .             Commissioner  of  Income  Tax  (international
                                                                    Taxation), Circle 3(1)(2), New Delhi - [2020] 121
                 SECTION 249 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 -          taxmann.com 102 (Delhi - Trib.)
                 COMMISSIONER  (APPEALS)  -  FORM  OF               Royalties/fees  for  technical  services  -  Computer
                 APPEAL AND LIMITATION                              software  :  Amended  definition  of  'Royalty'  under
                                                                    domestic  law  even  if  amended  with  retrospective
                 Reena  Agarwal  v.  Union  of  India  -  [2020]  121   effect  cannot  be  extended  to  definition  of  'Royalty'
                 taxmann.com 26 (Gauhati)                           under DTAA since said term has not been amended in
                 Condonation  of  delay  :  Where  Commissioner     DTAA .
                 (Appeals)'s order did not record materials on basis of
                 which satisfaction was arrived at that grounds urged by   H a r i h a r a n S u b r a m a n i a m   v.   A s s i s t a n t
                 assessee  in  support  of  its  prayer  for  condonation  of   Commissioner  of  Income  Tax,  Circle  6(1),  New
                 delay  were  not  sufficient  grounds  to  condone  delay,   Delhi - [2020] 121 taxmann.com 189 (Delhi - Trib.)
                 matter was remanded back to Commissioner (Appeals)   Independent personal services - Legal services : Where
                 to decide afresh issue of condonation of delay .   assessee,  a  legal  practitioner  in  field  of  intellectual
                                                                    property  rights,  availed  services  of  foreign  legal


                                                                 18

        e-JOURNAL
       e-JOURNAL
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27