Page 18 - DTPA Journal December 21
P. 18

e         Journal
                                                                             eJournal








                                                                                           Nov. - Dec., 2021


                 on basis of interim order of SEBI alleging that certain   Product development expenses : Product development
                 entities  were  deliberately  making  repeated  losses   expenses are deductible even though said expenditure
                 through their trading in stock option .            was to be amortized over a period of 3 years as per
                                                                    accounting practice adopted by assessee .
                 SECTION 32 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 -
                 DEPRECIATION                                       SECTION  234B  OF  THE  INCOME-TAX  ACT,
                                                                    1961 - INTEREST, CHARGEABLE AS
                 IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of
                 Income-tax, Circle-4(1)(2), Bangalore - [2020] 120   IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of
                 taxmann.com 424 (Bangalore - Trib.)                Income-tax, Circle-4(1)(2), Bangalore - [2020] 120
                                                                    taxmann.com 424 (Bangalore - Trib.)
                 Leased  assets  :Assessee-company  was  eligible  for
                 depreciation on leased assets .                    Assessee-company was eligible to pay interest under
                                                                    section 234B on incremental income arisen to it due to
                 IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of   Advanced Pricing Agreement (APA) entered by it with
                 Income-tax, Circle-4(1)(2), Bangalore - [2020] 120   CBDT .
                 taxmann.com 424 (Bangalore - Trib.)
                                                                    Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore v. JSW
                 Computer  software  :Assessee-company  was  to  be   Steel Ltd. - [2020] 121
                 allowed depreciation at rate of 60 per cent on computer   Deferred tax liability : Interest under section 234-B
                 software that were capitalized .                   was chargeable where assessee failed to pay advance
                                                                    tax  in  respect  of  deferred  tax  liabilityin  view  of
                 SECTION  37(1)  OF  THE  INCOME-TAX  ACT,          insertion of clause (h) to second proviso to section
                 1961 - BUSINESS EXPENDITURE                        115JB (1) .


                 IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of   SECTION  2(35)  OF  THE  INCOME-TAX  ACT,
                 Income-tax, Circle-4(1)(2), Bangalore - [2020] 120   1961 - PRINCIPAL OFFICER
                 taxmann.com 424 (Bangalore - Trib.)
                 Suomotu disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) : Where   Suvendra  Kumar  Panda  v.  Income  Tax  Officer,
                 assessee-company debited certain amount on account   Corporate  Ward  6(2),  Chennai  -  [2020]  121
                 of various expenditures like rent, professional charges,   taxmann.com 27 (Madras)
                 sub-contract charges, interest, royalty, etc. in its P&L   Reassessment notice : Where petitioner had acted as a
                 account  that  attracted  provisions  of  TDS  and  made   director of company for a short period and disclosed
                 suomotu  disallowance  of  said  amount  under  section   details of acting directors, acting directors of company
                 40(a)(ia), since these expenses were related to day-to-  being  available,  department  could  have  proceeded
                 day running of business of assessee, same could not be   against  any  one  of  such  acting  directors  for
                 disallowed  under  section  37(1)  merely  because   reassessment proceedings and could have treated any
                 assessee  had  made  suomotu  disallowance  of  same   one of them as Principal Officer, and, thus, impugned
                 under section 40(a)(ia) .                          order treating petitioner as Principal Officer was set
                                                                    aside.
                 Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Coimbatore
                 v.  Vijayeshwari  Textiles  Ltd.  -  [2020]  121   SECTION 4 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 -
                 taxmann.com 29 (Madras)                            INCOME - CHARGEABLE AS
                                                                 14

        e-JOURNAL
       e-JOURNAL
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23